Le 23/05/2022 à 23:00, Wol a écrit :
On 23/05/2022 20:19, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Vendoring Guile seems totally impractical. The Guile compilation does
some sort of bootstrapping, which makes building it from scratch
glacially slow (like: O(1 hour)), so it would be impossible for day to
day deve
Wol writes:
> On 23/05/2022 20:19, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> Vendoring Guile seems totally impractical. The Guile compilation does
>> some sort of bootstrapping, which makes building it from scratch
>> glacially slow (like: O(1 hour)), so it would be impossible for day to
>> day development work
On 23/05/2022 20:19, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Vendoring Guile seems totally impractical. The Guile compilation does
some sort of bootstrapping, which makes building it from scratch
glacially slow (like: O(1 hour)), so it would be impossible for day to
day development work.
Just an idea, if "curr
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 9:19 PM Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> I'm missing the context for this proposal.
>
Something in the original thread from Jonas made me think some distros were
wrangling keeping up distributing
guile only for lilypond's benefit. It's possible I misunderstood and he
actually me
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 7:48 PM Luca Fascione wrote:
> I would like to bring up an option that I'd expect fair few of you will
> _really_ not like.
> I'm doing this not because I necessarily believe it to be a
> particularly good way forward,
> rather because I feel it is sometimes useful to artic
This also makes a lot of sense to me, yes.
L
On Mon, 23 May 2022, 13:12 Jean Abou Samra, wrote:
>
>
> Le 22/05/2022 à 21:52, Luca Fascione a écrit :
> >
> > On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 9:05 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2022-05-22 at 20:14 +0200, Luca Fascione wrote:
> > > So at
Le 22/05/2022 à 21:52, Luca Fascione a écrit :
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 9:05 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
On Sun, 2022-05-22 at 20:14 +0200, Luca Fascione wrote:
> So at the cost of rocking the cage a bit hard, I came asking the
> uncomfortable question:
> what would happen if (f
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 9:05 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-05-22 at 20:14 +0200, Luca Fascione wrote:
> > So at the cost of rocking the cage a bit hard, I came asking the
> > uncomfortable question:
> > what would happen if (for this unique circumstance) we'd do what one
> > would norma
On Sun, 2022-05-22 at 20:14 +0200, Luca Fascione wrote:
> So at the cost of rocking the cage a bit hard, I came asking the
> uncomfortable question:
> what would happen if (for this unique circumstance) we'd do what one
> would normally consider poor practice?
Let's call your proposal by its true,
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 8:02 PM David Kastrup wrote:
> What do you mean with "shipped"?
I mean that when you clone the lilypond repo you'd find one more directory,
say
guile-2.2.7+/
or
guile-3.0.8+/
or something like that.
In fact we'd likely end up compiling a slightly different version thereo
Luca Fascione writes:
> I would like to bring up an option that I'd expect fair few of you will
> _really_ not like.
> I'm doing this not because I necessarily believe it to be a
> particularly good way forward,
> rather because I feel it is sometimes useful to articulate in words why an
> "obvio
I would like to bring up an option that I'd expect fair few of you will
_really_ not like.
I'm doing this not because I necessarily believe it to be a
particularly good way forward,
rather because I feel it is sometimes useful to articulate in words why an
"obviously awful idea" is, in fact, awful.
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le 22/05/2022 à 17:04, David Kastrup a écrit :
>> [...]
>>> Also see
>>>
>>> guile$ git shortlog -ns --since="2 months ago"
>>> 2 Timothy Sample
>>> 1 Ludovic Courtès
>>> 1 Mikael Djurfeldt
>> Well, it's the stable release branch.
>
>
> What would be
Thomas Morley writes:
> Am Mi., 22. Jan. 2020 um 00:59 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
>>
>>
>> #(ly:set-option 'warning-as-error #t)
>> %% not sure why these warnings appear twice [dfe]
>> -#(ly:expect-warning (_ "default child context begins a cycle: `~a'") 'Score)
>> -#(ly:expect-warning (_ "can
Am Mi., 22. Jan. 2020 um 00:59 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
>
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > some remarks:
> >
> > Guile-3.0
> > First I compiled successfully guile-master from their repo, giving GNU
> > Guile 3.0.0.6-f3298
> > Trying to compile LilyPond with that guile (ofcourse adding
Thomas Morley writes:
> Hi,
>
> some remarks:
>
> Guile-3.0
> First I compiled successfully guile-master from their repo, giving GNU
> Guile 3.0.0.6-f3298
> Trying to compile LilyPond with that guile (ofcourse adding a bunch of
> patches) I had some problems pointing configure to the correct guil
Am Mi., 22. Jan. 2020 um 00:41 Uhr schrieb Karlin High :
>
> On 1/21/2020 5:10 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> > Afterwards I've got a successful ´make´ with current LilyPond-master.
>
> So it's a functional LilyPond with guile-3.0? How does it perform if fed
> something big? I'm thinking of the thread
On 1/21/2020 5:10 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
Afterwards I've got a successful ´make´ with current LilyPond-master.
So it's a functional LilyPond with guile-3.0? How does it perform if fed
something big? I'm thinking of the thread on benchmarking that used
Vaughan McAlley's MDSM.ly, the Robert C
18 matches
Mail list logo
