Am 19.05.2015 um 09:04 schrieb James Lowe:
[...]
Oh if someone could look at the script that Mark Hohl (I think) created
a while back called 'make-countdown-announcement.sh'
No, it was Mark Polesky who added it.
Cheers,
Marc
___
lilypond-devel m
On 12/05/15 21:15, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> James wrote Tuesday, May 12, 2015 1:46 PM
>>
>>> Trevor
>> Do we even need a new git-cl?
>>
>> I am no expert but wasn't that designed to get around the fact that we
>> had to upload to two different places (one place for actual review and
>> one for
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 17, 2015 8:49 AM
>
> Should I ask at Savannah how they view the prospect of running Allura?
> Are there obvious selling points over Savane? Like that there is an API
> for manipulating issues?
No harm in asking. Presumably they would need to undertake its ongoing
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> Further to this, I had a very helpful interchange today with one of
> the other users at SourceForge who responded to my ticket. He
> suggested exporting the text part of the DB as a JSON file, changing
> all the occurrences of "author": "*anonymous" to "author":
> "td
Trevor Daniels wrote Saturday, May 16, 2015 10:44 AM
>
> I've pretty well completed my assessment of Allura at SourceForge, and find
> the facilities available pretty well match our needs, in fact they are
> surprisingly similar to those at GoogleCode. There are some differences but
> none whi
Trevor Daniels wrote Saturday, May 16, 2015 12:27 PM
>
> David Kastrup wrote Saturday, May 16, 2015 11:11 AM
>
>>> Trevor Daniels wrote Tuesday, May 12, 2015 9:15 PM
>>>
I'm sure we'll find some undesirable features of Allura when we get
>>> down to the details, but that's what the next few
David Kastrup wrote Saturday, May 16, 2015 11:11 AM
>> Trevor Daniels wrote Tuesday, May 12, 2015 9:15 PM
>>
>>> I'm sure we'll find some undesirable features of Allura when we get
>> down to the details, but that's what the next few weeks will tell us.
>>
>> I've pretty well completed my assessm
Phil Holmes wrote Saturday, May 16, 2015 11:17 AM
>
>> Trevor Daniels wrote Tuesday, May 12, 2015 9:15 PM
>>
>>> I'm sure we'll find some undesirable features of Allura when we get down
>>> to the details, but that's what the next few weeks will tell us.
>>
>> I've pretty well completed my assess
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> Trevor Daniels wrote Tuesday, May 12, 2015 9:15 PM
>
>> I'm sure we'll find some undesirable features of Allura when we get
> down to the details, but that's what the next few weeks will tell us.
>
> I've pretty well completed my assessment of Allura at SourceForge, and
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Trevor Daniels" ; "James" ; "Phil
Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2015 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down
Trevor Daniels wrote Tuesday, May 12, 2015 9:15 PM
I'm sure w
Trevor Daniels wrote Tuesday, May 12, 2015 9:15 PM
> I'm sure we'll find some undesirable features of Allura when we get down to
> the details, but that's what the next few weeks will tell us.
I've pretty well completed my assessment of Allura at SourceForge, and find the
facilities available
James wrote Tuesday, May 12, 2015 1:46 PM
>
>> Trevor
> Do we even need a new git-cl?
>
> I am no expert but wasn't that designed to get around the fact that we
> had to upload to two different places (one place for actual review and
> one for a note on the tracker). Does this new place come wi
Carl, you wrote Tuesday, May 12, 2015 8:45 PM
> On 5/11/15 11:06 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>>The second, with 4369 issues, is
>>https://sourceforge.net/p/testlily/issues/ I've not done anything to
>>tailor this to our needs yet. I intend to do that over the next few days
>>as I work through
Carl Sorensen wrote Tuesday, May 12, 2015 8:32 PM
>>On 11/05/15 23:04, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>>> Phil Holmes wrote Monday, May 11, 2015 6:21 PM
>>>
Have you investigated the API for patch and git-cl?
>>> I've quickly looked at Allura's API. It seems to contain all the
>>>features we would n
On 5/11/15 11:06 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>The second, with 4369 issues, is
>https://sourceforge.net/p/testlily/issues/ I've not done anything to
>tailor this to our needs yet. I intend to do that over the next few days
>as I work through your requirements list. Anyone can read, project
>m
On 5/12/15 6:46 AM, "James" wrote:
>
>
>On 11/05/15 23:04, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> Phil Holmes wrote Monday, May 11, 2015 6:21 PM
>>
>>> Have you investigated the API for patch and git-cl?
>> I've quickly looked at Allura's API. It seems to contain all the
>>features we would need. I've also
On 11/05/15 23:04, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Phil Holmes wrote Monday, May 11, 2015 6:21 PM
At some point we will need to freeze the Google version, copy them over and
move to the new version. This is probably better done sooner than later,
once we're sure that the move is correct. It will pr
Phil Holmes wrote Monday, May 11, 2015 6:21 PM
> At some point we will need to freeze the Google version, copy them over and
> move to the new version. This is probably better done sooner than later,
> once we're sure that the move is correct. It will presumably also mean no
> updates to is
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Joseph Rushton Wakeling"
; "Werner LEMBERG" ;
Cc:
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down
Phil Holmes wrote Monday, May 11, 2015 4:37 PM
Phil Holmes wrote Monday, May 11, 2015 4:37 PM
>
> Trevor Daniels wrote Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:05 PM
>>
>> As to the match of Allura to our needs, AFAICS it can provide everything
>> in Phil's requirements list except for the automatic handling of blocked
>> issues. I'll double check this o
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Trevor Daniels" ; "Joseph Rushton Wakeling"
; "Phil Holmes" ; "Werner
LEMBERG" ;
Cc:
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down
Trevor Daniels
Trevor Daniels wrote Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:05 PM
> I'm just importing the issue DB at the moment.
I've now tried twice to import our Issue DB from GoogleCode to Allura at
SourceForge. As previously reported the first attempt failed after 1112
issues. The second attempt also resulted in
Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote Wednesday, May 06, 2015 9:37 PM
> Anyway, whenever you have something to share, I'll try and follow up on
> whether
> it's feasible with Launchpad. (BTW I recognize there are concerns about
> switching to another 3rd-party service, even if free software; so pleas
On 03/05/15 16:53, Phil Holmes wrote:
I'd be willing to start a draft "requirements for issue handling" document
tomorrow, if no-one else is desperate.
That'd be great, though it'd be even better if there could be clear requirements
beyond merely those of issue handling -- code hosting, code r
Carl Sorensen wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 11:44 PM
> On 5/4/15 3:44 PM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>>
>>Trevor Daniels wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 10:01 PM
>>
>>> OK, I've created a project on SourceForge and started
>>> downloading the issues DB from GoogleCode.
>>[snip]
>>> You can see the progress
On 5/4/15 3:44 PM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
>Trevor Daniels wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 10:01 PM
>
>> OK, I've created a project on SourceForge and started
>> downloading the issues DB from GoogleCode.
>[snip]
>> You can see the progress here:
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/tickets
Trevor Daniels wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 10:01 PM
> OK, I've created a project on SourceForge and started
> downloading the issues DB from GoogleCode.
[snip]
> You can see the progress here:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/tickets/
Update: (one ladder, two snakes)
1. I now see that
On 04/05/15 22:01, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> You can see the progress here:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/tickets/
I'm getting
Error 403
Read access required
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu
Carl Sorensen wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 8:40 PM
> So perhaps it would be a good idea to test Allura
> on SourceForge, and see if we like it. If we do,
> then we could let the Savannah people know, and
> maybe they'd be willing to use it as their issue tracker.
OK, I've created a project on Sou
On 5/4/15 1:16 PM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
>Carl Sorensen
>
>> I'm fine if we can get everything on Savannah, but it seems
>> to me that in the past, there was a feeling that Savane's
>> bug tracking was significantly inferior to Google Code.
>> I don't know, because I never used it.
>
>Just
Carl Sorensen
> I'm fine if we can get everything on Savannah, but it seems
> to me that in the past, there was a feeling that Savane's
> bug tracking was significantly inferior to Google Code.
> I don't know, because I never used it.
Just as a reminder, we had a very helpful interchange with
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 5/4/15 10:21 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>>If we have a really viable migration path out of non-Savannah hosting,
>>it seems like putting our eggs not in too many outsourced baskets
>>might save us from some future headaches like the Google code one.
>
> I'm not sure
On 5/4/15 10:16 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>Ah, wait .. sourceforce have an importer from GoogleCode. I had to
>register to see it, but that's easy. After that, it's here
>
>https://sourceforge.net/p/import_project/google-code/
>
>It says it will import Wiki pages, source code (SVN, Git or Hg),
On 5/4/15 10:21 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>Wasn't Savannah's main system Savane a fork of SourceForge's proprietary
>software version? Anybody have more of a clue about the relations
>between the various versions and what that might mean for our chances of
>getting this system adopted by Sava
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David Kastrup wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 5:21 PM
>
>> Wasn't Savannah's main system Savane a fork of SourceForge's proprietary
>> software version? Anybody have more of a clue about the relations
>> between the various versions and what that might mean for our chances
David Kastrup wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 5:21 PM
> Wasn't Savannah's main system Savane a fork of SourceForge's proprietary
> software version? Anybody have more of a clue about the relations
> between the various versions and what that might mean for our chances of
> getting this system adopted
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> Federico Bruni wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 2:53 PM
>
>> Interesting!
>> https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Features/
>>
>> I think that the main alternatives are Launchpad (Affero GPL) and Apache
>> Allura (Apache License).
>> Launchpad provides also the host
Federico Bruni wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 2:53 PM
> Interesting!
> https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Features/
>
> I think that the main alternatives are Launchpad (Affero GPL) and Apache
> Allura (Apache License).
> Launchpad provides also the hosting, while Allura should be deploye
2015-05-04 14:46 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen :
> More hunting around on Savannah led me to Apache Allura, which is claimed
> to be an open-source (Apache license) follow-on to the
> proprietary-software SourceForge.
>
> It uses git, has webhooks (
> https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Webhoo
On 5/3/15 9:48 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>
>In searching around on Savannah's page, I found InDefero
>http://www.indefero.net/ which claims to be an open-source lightweight
>copy of Google Code. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that there are any
>publicly available hosting sites using it, so
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David Kastrup wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 11:30 AM
>
>> Anyone evaluated/tested/whatever Kallithea?
>> https://kallithea-scm.org/>. It seems aligned to the Software
>> Freedom Convervancy, so maybe we could get Savannah to support it if it
>> does the job.
>
> Kallithea
David Kastrup wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 11:30 AM
> Anyone evaluated/tested/whatever Kallithea?
> https://kallithea-scm.org/>. It seems aligned to the Software
> Freedom Convervancy, so maybe we could get Savannah to support it if it
> does the job.
Kallithea doesn't seem to have a native issue
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 5/3/15 8:33 AM, "Joseph Rushton Wakeling"
> wrote:
>
>>On 10/04/15 09:34, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> So the question is whether Launchpad has a usable API, right? Joseph,
>>> do you know more?c
>>
>>Just to follow up on this, I exchanged a few messages on Reddit with
>
Carl Sorensen wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 4:48 AM
> In searching around on Savannah's page, I found InDefero
> http://www.indefero.net/ which claims to be an open-source lightweight
> copy of Google Code. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that there are any
> publicly available hosting sites using
On 5/3/15 8:33 AM, "Joseph Rushton Wakeling"
wrote:
>On 10/04/15 09:34, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> So the question is whether Launchpad has a usable API, right? Joseph,
>> do you know more?c
>
>Just to follow up on this, I exchanged a few messages on Reddit with
>Colin
>Watson (who's leading the
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Rushton Wakeling"
To: "Werner LEMBERG" ;
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2015 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down
On 10/04/15 09:34, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
So the question is whether Launchpad has a usable API, right?
On 10/04/15 09:34, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
So the question is whether Launchpad has a usable API, right? Joseph,
do you know more?c
Just to follow up on this, I exchanged a few messages on Reddit with Colin
Watson (who's leading the git-support effort) following this announcement:
http://blog.
On 10/04/15 09:34, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
While I don't like bzr, the launchpad interface for reporting bugs and
the like looks OK to me. So yes, this is a possible solution.
I think this has already been mentioned but just to chip in that it
isn't just about reviewing patches, patches have to
hello,
On 09/04/15 16:10, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
But the situation overall is a nuisance.
Might be worth keeping a weather eye on Launchpad, as this is free
software and is currently in the process of gaining git support:
https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Git
Interesting!
It's been a while sinc
>> But the situation overall is a nuisance.
>
> Might be worth keeping a weather eye on Launchpad, as this is free
> software and is currently in the process of gaining git support:
> https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Git
Interesting!
> It's been a while since I last used it, but it has a nice
>
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> Federico Bruni ha scritto Monday, March 16, 2015 8:01 AM
> Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down
>
>> I had much better experience with Redmine (Ruby on Rails). You can see
>> an example here:
>> http://darktable.org/redmine
Federico Bruni ha scritto Monday, March 16, 2015 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down
> I had much better experience with Redmine (Ruby on Rails). You can see
> an example here:
> http://darktable.org/redmine/projects/darktable
Redmine looks rather overkill for our
Il giorno lun 16 mar 2015 alle 5:23, Carl Sorensen
ha scritto:
I've used GitLab for other projects. The issue tracker doesn't
appear to
me to be nearly as good as what we had set up at Google Code.
Does anybody have any experience with bugzilla as an issue tracker?
It
seems to be the most f
On 3/13/15 5:10 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:33:22AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> I can click the "export" button so all the issues are migrated to
>> github. Thoughts, ideas?
>>
>> Didn't someone setup a lilypond organization at github?
>
>There was some discu
54 matches
Mail list logo
