2011/7/27 Graham Percival :
> Most people seem to like the status quo.
>
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_6.html
>
> ** Proposal summary
>
> Potentially sensitive or private matters will be referred to
> Graham. He will then decide who should discuss the matter on an
> ad-hoc basis, and forwar
2011/7/22 Graham Percival
> ** Proposal summary
>
> What should we do with potentially sensitive or private matters in
> lilypond? I see two possible solutions:
>
> 1. Pick one person to manage private discussions.
> 2. Have a private mailing list with a known list of people who
> will discuss
Graham Percival writes:
> I'll reiterate that I don't think this is a great long-term
> solution -- I view the "private CCing" idea as a temporary
> compromise for the next 12-18 months. Once we've gotten into the
> habit of regular releases, a more firm set of development
> proposals+guidelines
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 08:20:04PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Once again, you make some excellent points.However if said list has to
> be limited to *five* people, I do question the need for a mailing list
> at all, rather than merely CCing whomever needs to be CCed.
For clarity: assuming
Valentin Villenave wrote Friday, July 22, 2011 7:20 PM
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
I would be in favour of a fixed private mailing list with
publicly
known members to decide a publicly known list of issues,
including the obvious granting/withdrawing git push ac
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I would be in favour of a fixed private mailing list with publicly
> known members to decide a publicly known list of issues,
> including the obvious granting/withdrawing git push access,
> but probably little else. Membership should be ei
>> If we want to pursue a private mailing list, rather than “whoever
>> Graham thinks/remembers to cc”, then the obvious question is “who
>> should be on it?”.
>
> I actually like the solution "whoever Graham thinks/remembers to
> cc."
Me too. I've subscribed to far too much mailing lists alrea
Graham Percival wrote Friday, July 22, 2011 12:59 AM
What should we do with potentially sensitive or private matters in
lilypond? I see two possible solutions:
1. Pick one person to manage private discussions. Whenever
there is a potentially sensitive topic, send an email to that
person. He
On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:21 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
>> On Jul 22, 2011, at 1:59 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>>> ** Private list membership?
>>>
>>> If we want to pursue a private mailing list, rather than “whoever
>>> Graham thinks/remembers to cc”, then th
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> On Jul 22, 2011, at 1:59 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
>
>> ** Private list membership?
>>
>> If we want to pursue a private mailing list, rather than “whoever
>> Graham thinks/remembers to cc”, then the obvious question is “who
>> should be on it?”.
>>
>> My init
On Jul 22, 2011, at 1:59 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> ** Private list membership?
>
> If we want to pursue a private mailing list, rather than “whoever
> Graham thinks/remembers to cc”, then the obvious question is “who
> should be on it?”.
>
> My initial thought is to keep it small – say, 5 peo
11 matches
Mail list logo
