On 2012/12/17 06:13:22, Keith wrote:
On 2012/12/16 08:09:38, dak wrote:
That works fine. The input below will show a single staff, except for
the one
line containing the voice-crossing section, regardless of where the
line-breaks
fall. (We can do this with current LilyPond using two Staff
On 2012/12/16 08:09:38, dak wrote:
Well, the idea was to use this in pairs of contexts with otherwise
identical harakiri conditions, and give only one of them the
dead-is-alive flag. So one context pops up only when the other
doesn't.
I had the idea of using this with the Keep_alive_together
k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
On 2012/12/15 21:32:41, dak wrote:
The "dead-is-alive"-thing had the
advantage that even though I did not understand what I am
working with, it was easy to make it behave as advertised.
"This reverses the decisions that the Hara_kiri_engraver makes."
This engra
On 2012/12/15 21:32:41, dak wrote:
The "dead-is-alive"-thing had the
advantage that even though I did not understand what I am
working with, it was easy to make it behave as advertised.
"This reverses the decisions that the Hara_kiri_engraver makes."
This engraver removes empty staves, so reve
On 2012/12/15 18:22:46, Keith wrote:
[...]
A re-arrangement in logic could give a useful option
"If a Staff with the 'alive_together_alternative' flag set has
anything
interesting to say on this line, but /none/ of his (un-flagged)
friends in his
keep-alive-together group do, then print him
On 2012/12/15 11:40:17, dak wrote:
I was sort of hoping that Keith would be able to make use of this
While the negative logic makes it not negligibly difficult to avoid
errors in understanding, I see no good way to use this.
If the usual method is:
"If this Staff has anything interesting to s
Reviewers: lemzwerg,
Message:
On 2012/12/15 10:48:12, lemzwerg wrote:
LGTM. Do we have a regtest (or rather, an example) which demonstrates
how to
use it?
I don't actually have one. Since this was inspired by a discussion on
the mailing list, I was sort of hoping that Keith would be able t
