On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 06:42:24AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> For the record: I'd likely not use git pull -r (which basically is a
> fetch and rebase on branch origin) in the LilyPond repository since it
> is not always the right thing in our master/staging setup, and is
> particularly wrong for
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2012/12/3 Aleksandr Andreev :
>> I went into my git-cl directory and did a git pull -r
>>
>> Works fine for me now.
>>> sorry, I still not have a working git-cl on LilyDev.
>>>
>>> harm@harm-laptop ~/lilypond-git (dev/local_working)$ git pull -r
>>>
>>> seems to be wrong,
t;Graham Percival"
>>>
>>> To: "Phil Holmes"
>>> Cc: ; "David Kastrup"
>>> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 8:55 PM
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Issue 2995: git-cly: Update to latest upload.py
>>> fromgoogle
>
>> Cc: ; "David Kastrup"
>> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 8:55 PM
>>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Issue 2995: git-cly: Update to latest upload.py
>> fromgoogle
>>
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 02:47:27PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>>&g
2012/12/2 Phil Holmes :
> - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
>
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Cc: ; "David Kastrup"
> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 8:55 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Issue 2995: git-cly: Update to latest upload.py
>
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 02:47:27PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> Graham - could you either give me access to git-cl or push this
>> patch, please?
>
> I've given Phil push access to git-cl. David, if you have a
> github account I'll add you too.
Haven't.
--
David Kast
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; "David Kastrup"
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Issue 2995: git-cly: Update to latest upload.py
fromgoogle
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 02:47:27PM -00
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 02:47:27PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Graham - could you either give me access to git-cl or push this
> patch, please?
I've given Phil push access to git-cl. David, if you have a
github account I'll add you too.
- Graham
___
l
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Kastrup"
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Cc: ; "Graham Percival"
> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 3:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Issue 2995: git-cly: Update to latest upload
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; "Graham Percival"
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Issue 2995: git-cly: Update to latest upload.py
fromgoogle
[snip]
Then there should be some other &
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
>>>
>>> The mail message would not apply - possibly because I had to go
>>> Windows text->unicode->Ubuntu box.
>>
>> No. You should _not_ go "through" anything. You should just save the
>> whole message as a file (using Ctrl-S or whatever is
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; "Graham Percival"
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Issue 2995: git-cly: Update to latest upload.py
fromgoogle
"Phil Holmes" writes:
If you s
"Phil Holmes" writes:
>> If you save the whole message (rather than doing some copy&paste job on
>> the mail client window) that should not be an issue in the first place.
>
> The mail message would not apply - possibly because I had to go
> Windows text->unicode->Ubuntu box.
No. You should _no
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Issue 2995: git-cly: Update to latest upload.py
fromgoogle
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: &q
14 matches
Mail list logo
