On Mon, Jul 27, 2009, Graham Percival said:
> let's do it.
I got busy and left off tracking this thread a while back, agree with you
completely, simple, no-brainer to convert present sources.
Having done that, there is one issue remaining, getting the standard
disclaimer(s) into new sources.
T
AFAIK, nothing really came from this thread, and I can't even
remember what I replied at the time. My opinion now: if that's
the legal advice from GNU, let's do it. Mark, are you willing to
do this, or shall we open an issue on the tracker for it?
Cheers,
- Graham
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 07:21:
On 19 Jul 2009, at 19:52, > wrote:
ask them to provide proof that you were the
clicker.
can we afford to pay the legal fees associated with the asking of that
question in court?
Only in fair justice systems...
Why waste time debateing? find a willing tadpole and turn them loose.
...ther
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009, Hans Aberg said:
> ask them to provide proof that you were the
> clicker.
can we afford to pay the legal fees associated with the asking of that
question in court?
Why waste time debateing? find a willing tadpole and turn them loose.
--
Dana Emery
__
On 18 Jul 2009, at 22:07, Graham Percival wrote:
That said, in some jurisdictions you can get higher damages if
you've included a "Copyright 20xx by blah".
There was an interesting example given about UK copyright law:
If somebody writes a letter to the Queen, she becomes the owner of
that
On 18 Jul 2009, at 22:07, Graham Percival wrote:
The
copyright symbol “©” can be included if you wish (and your
character set
supports it), but it's not necessary. There is no legal
significance to
using the three-character sequence “(C)”, although it does no harm.
There is nowadays no le
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:30:13AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Hans Aberg wrote:
> > > The
> > > copyright symbol “©” can be included if you wish (and your character set
> > > supports it), but it's not necessary. There is no legal significance to
> > > using the three-character sequence “(C)”,
Hans Aberg wrote:
> > The
> > copyright symbol “©” can be included if you wish (and your character set
> > supports it), but it's not necessary. There is no legal significance to
> > using the three-character sequence “(C)”, although it does no harm.
>
> There is nowadays no legal significance of
On 18 Jul 2009, at 04:21, Mark Polesky wrote:
The
copyright symbol “©” can be included if you wish (and your character
set
supports it), but it's not necessary. There is no legal significance
to
using the three-character sequence “(C)”, although it does no harm.
There is nowadays no legal
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009, Mark Polesky said:
>
> Is this something to address?
Depends on how much value is placed on the copyrights, and the legal
validity of gnu's viewpoint (which I am not disputing, I have no
particular knowledge of copyright law). At issue is the prospect of
someone winning
10 matches
Mail list logo
