2007/4/13, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I completely agree about the problem! Since we started moving properties
into details, we have lost the documentation of a number of them (some
are now described within the main manual, but not all). From a users
perspective,
I agree about this, h
I completely agree about the problem! Since we started moving properties
into details, we have lost the documentation of a number of them (some
are now described within the main manual, but not all). From a users
perspective,
the introduction of these subproperties has definitely not been an
im
> -Original Message-
> From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 8:55 PM
> > The main concern I have about this is documenting the
> possible values
> > for 'details. Do you have an idea for how this
> documentation might be
> > done? If we re
Carl D. Sorensen byu.edu> writes:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
>
> > From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:hanwen lilypond.org]
> > Although I appreciate the idea of making everything tunable,
> > if we continue with this pace, over half of the properties
> > will be fret diagram tweaks. Ca
2007/4/9, Carl D. Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The main concern I have about this is documenting the possible values
for 'details. Do you have an idea for how this documentation might be
done? If we replace all of the individual fret-diagram properties with
a single 'details property, would t
> -Original Message-
> From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Although I appreciate the idea of making everything tunable,
> if we continue with this pace, over half of the properties
> will be fret diagram tweaks. Can you have a look to see if
> you can change some of th
Carl D. Sorensen escreveu:
> I've changed the code for fret diagrams to allow some of the changes
> requested by Jose Luis Cruz. I'm doing very little development now, so
> I'm not up to speed on using git to post changes; instead I'm posting
> patches to lily-devel.
> 2007-03-26 Carl D. Sorense
