On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:11:27 +0200
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/26 Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > While I'm at it, I was proposing to implement the category thing.
>
> You're welcome; the question was also whether to give the category as
> an optional argu
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicolas Sceaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 3:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: lily-devel; Mats Bengtsson
> Subject: Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)
>
> Le 26 avr. 08 à 04:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys a é
2008/4/26 Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No, they do work as TextScript or RehearsalMark, but you have to
> adapt line-width.
Right! They do work as TextScripts attached to a note, but as
RehearsalMarks they can go out of the page (or when they're attached
to MultiMeasureRests, see issue
Le 26 avr. 08 à 13:11, Valentin Villenave a écrit :
- toplevel (here we'd better put all commands that don't work inside a
\score block, e.g. \fill-line, \wordwrap, \justify-string etc.)
No, they do work as TextScript or RehearsalMark, but you have to
adapt line-width.
_
2008/4/26 Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Valentin is already working on giving
> > define-builtin-markup-command an extra argument for "category",
Hmm, I'm not anymore right now; I'm waiting to see where this thread
is going... :)
> > I don't know precisely what Han-Wen and Mats were ta
Le 26 avr. 08 à 12:21, Graham Percival a écrit :
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:02:03 +0200
Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le 26 avr. 08 __ 11:49, Nicolas Sceaux a __crit :
Le 26 avr. 08 __ 04:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys a __crit :
It would be cool if we could define the markups like
(defin
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:02:03 +0200
Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 26 avr. 08 __ 11:49, Nicolas Sceaux a __crit :
>
> > Le 26 avr. 08 __ 04:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys a __crit :
> >
> >> It would be cool if we could define the markups like
> >>
> >> (define-markup-command (bla layout
Le 26 avr. 08 à 11:49, Nicolas Sceaux a écrit :
Le 26 avr. 08 à 04:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
It would be cool if we could define the markups like
(define-markup-command (bla layout properties width arg) (number?
markup?)
((line-thickness 0.0)
(corner-radius 0.2))
..
)
where this
Le 26 avr. 08 à 04:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
It would be cool if we could define the markups like
(define-markup-command (bla layout properties width arg) (number?
markup?)
((line-thickness 0.0)
(corner-radius 0.2))
..
)
where this defines that the bla command uses line-thicknes
2008/4/25 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > John: I'm sorry for the breakage. I have removed the property
> definition.
> > >
> > > Han-Wen: Do you mean these properties are not associated with any grob?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Properties are usually associated with interfaces. - we don't hav
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2008/4/22 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2008/4/22 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
FWIW, I usually leave out documentation for markup-specific
> properties. You could put them in the doc string of the markup
> command.
John: I'm
2008/4/22 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/4/22 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > FWIW, I usually leave out documentation for markup-specific
> > properties. You could put them in the doc string of the markup
> > command.
>
> John: I'm sorry for the breakage. I have r
2008/4/22 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> FWIW, I usually leave out documentation for markup-specific
> properties. You could put them in the doc string of the markup
> command.
John: I'm sorry for the breakage. I have removed the property definition.
Han-Wen: Do you mean these proper
FWIW, I usually leave out documentation for markup-specific
properties. You could put them in the doc string of the markup
command.
2008/4/22 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Valentin,
>
> I experience a failure with both make and make web fail when generating
> internals documentation
14 matches
Mail list logo
