Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "James Lowe"
Cc: "Carl Sorensen" ; "Francisco Vila"
; "LilyPond-Devel list" ;
"Phil Holmes"
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: 2.14.1 released; attention
On 6/15/11 7:14 AM, "James Lowe" wrote:
> Carl,
>
> )-Original Message-
> )From: Carl Sorensen [mailto:c_soren...@byu.edu]
> )Sent: 15 June 2011 14:04
> )To: James Lowe; Francisco Vila
> )Cc: LilyPond-Devel list
> )Subject: Re: 2.14.1 released; atte
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 01:14:09PM +, James Lowe wrote:
> I cannot see an option to add a 'backport' tag - for example I can see how to
> add the 'Type-Defect' and 'Priority-medium' etc. But nothing with 'Backport'
> in the string. So is there a specific way to do this?
at the moment, it's a
Carl,
)-Original Message-
)From: Carl Sorensen [mailto:c_soren...@byu.edu]
)Sent: 15 June 2011 14:04
)To: James Lowe; Francisco Vila
)Cc: LilyPond-Devel list
)Subject: Re: 2.14.1 released; attention span over
)Importance: Low
)
)
)
)
)On 6/15/11 6:21 AM, "James Lowe&qu
On 6/15/11 6:21 AM, "James Lowe" wrote:
\
>
> Does that also mean that you need me to do something (apart from hurry up and
> get the patches for the doc bugs done!)?
When you push a patch for a doc bug that applies to 2.14, please make sure
there's a google code issue with a backport tag.
Hello
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of Carl Sorensen
)Sent: 15 June 2011 03:22
)To: Francisco Vila
)Cc: LilyPond-Devel list
)Subject: Re: 2.14.1 released
On 6/14/11 5:06 PM, "Francisco Vila" wrote:
> 2011/6/14 Carl Sorensen :
>
>> I guess if we have documentation bugs it would be nice to have them fixed
>> before release.
>>
>> Would a 1-week notification serve?
>
> Yes. If 2.14-x releases are to be frequent and/or numerous, this is
> not so im
2011/6/14 Carl Sorensen :
> I guess if we have documentation bugs it would be nice to have them fixed
> before release.
>
> Would a 1-week notification serve?
Yes. If 2.14-x releases are to be frequent and/or numerous, this is
not so important. If we are going to live with a maximum of 2.14-3
fo
On 6/14/11 1:07 PM, "Francisco Vila" wrote:
> 2011/6/12 Francisco Vila :
>> 2011/6/12 Graham Percival :
>>>
>>> I'll still make 2.14 releases -- just tell me to build a release,
>>> and I'll do that based on the current stable/2.14 branch in git.
>>> At the moment, Carl is the person to backport
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:07:01PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Graham; it would be _very_ appreciated if you'd announce a new stable
> 2.14-x release some days in advance. Thank you very much
As far as I'm concerned, all 2.14.x releases will happen when Carl
asks me to make one. I leave this c
2011/6/12 Francisco Vila :
> 2011/6/12 Graham Percival :
>> I've just uploaded lilypond 2.14.1. The stable/2.14 git branch
>> has diverged sufficiently from master that I'm not even going to
>> pretend to care about stable/2.14 any more. I'm bored with the
>> number 14, and I have enough other th
2011/6/12 Graham Percival :
> I've just uploaded lilypond 2.14.1. The stable/2.14 git branch
> has diverged sufficiently from master that I'm not even going to
> pretend to care about stable/2.14 any more. I'm bored with the
> number 14, and I have enough other things to pay attention to.
>
> I'l
12 matches
Mail list logo
