Hello,
On 09/06/2010 17:00, Carl Sorensen wrote:
...
The back-quote means that any expression in the back-quoted list that is
preceded by a comma will be evaluated. The regular single quote means that
nothing in the list will be evaluated; the list will just be assembled.
Thanks Carl, my quer
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 6/9/10 7:34 AM, "James Lowe" wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Going on from the 'curly quotes' problem that was resolved a couple of
>> days back in our documentation, I noticed in the NR while scanning
>> through another 'odd' single quote mark after the hash (#) character.
On 6/9/10 7:34 AM, "James Lowe" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Going on from the 'curly quotes' problem that was resolved a couple of
> days back in our documentation, I noticed in the NR while scanning
> through another 'odd' single quote mark after the hash (#) character.
>
> \override #`(direction .
Thanks Jay.
Jay Anderson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:34 AM, James Lowe wrote:
I wondered if anyone can tell me if this is a mistake or what the
significance of the back-quote is vs the standard singe quote?
It is intentional. Look up scheme's quasiquote and unquote functions.
-Jay
pkx166h wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Going on from the 'curly quotes' problem that was resolved a couple of
> days back in our documentation, I noticed in the NR while scanning
> through another 'odd' single quote mark after the hash (#) character.
>
> \override #`(direction . ,UP)
>
> instead of
>
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:34 AM, James Lowe wrote:
> I wondered if anyone can tell me if this is a mistake or what the
> significance of the back-quote is vs the standard singe quote?
It is intentional. Look up scheme's quasiquote and unquote functions.
-Jay
_
Hello,
Going on from the 'curly quotes' problem that was resolved a couple of
days back in our documentation, I noticed in the NR while scanning
through another 'odd' single quote mark after the hash (#) character.
\override #`(direction . ,UP)
instead of
\override #'(direction . ,UP)
See att
