On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> I believe the highest bounty so far was 250 euro, back in the days
> when Han-Wen was working full-time and Trevor Baca was requesting many
> new features.
FTR -- The highest bounty I ever paid was 500 euros, in 2007.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010
Op dinsdag 15-06-2010 om 16:50 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham
Percival:
> I really cannot recall seeing any offers of "thousands of Euros". If
> they're still valid offers, please send info to bug-lilypond.
> That has been attempted before... hmm, 2007? Han-Wen tried to work on
> lilypond
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Boris Shingarov wrote:
> This is not what we are saying in our presentation and/or paper.
> What we are saying is: "We attempted a publication of a major critical
> edition through a major publishing house, using software from a volunteer
> open-source project with
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Boris Shingarov wrote:
> On 06/09/2010 10:52 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Uh, am I by now in everybody's killfile
>
> I do not know why you keep saying these things, but to avoid any
> misunderstanding I must publicly state that David is in the top half-dozen
>
On 06/09/2010 10:52 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Uh, am I by now in everybody's killfile
I do not know why you keep saying these things, but to avoid any
misunderstanding I must publicly state that David is in the top
half-dozen on *my* list of most respected LilyPond people.
On 06/13/2010 09:2
On 6/13/10 9:17 AM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
>
>> If there are other patches that are not yet up to
>> LilyPond status, but might be able to get there, it would be nice to have
>> them listed as issues with patches attached.
>
> I suppose a starting point could be to look at the patches al
Am Sonntag, 13. Juni 2010, um 16:55:01 schrieben Sie:
> May I suggest that "Publisher-Grade" is perhaps a misnomer? This makes it
> sound like we can't produce *any* publisher-grade music without footnotes,
> or endnotes, or widow/orphan control. Perhaps an adjustment to the title
> to "Publisher
On 6/13/10 12:02 AM, "Boris Shingarov" wrote:
> Hi Graham and all Lilyponders,
>
> I was quite astonished to hear that my slides were understood to mean anything
> pessimistic or negative. If they give people this impression, then it is a
> defect of the slides which I will fix.
>
> But rig
Le 13 juin 2010 à 15:22, David Kastrup a écrit :
> If the worst Boris can come up with with regard to developer attitudes
> are misconstrued postings of mine (heck, I'd think I can be enough of a
> problem without reverting to such tactics) or replies to them, the
> situation cannot be all that ba
Neil Puttock writes:
> On 13 June 2010 07:02, Boris Shingarov wrote:
>
>> "Your post is absolutely unnecessary"
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-u...@gnu.org/msg52334.html
>
> That comment wasn't directed at Jiříi; it was part of a reply to David
> Kastrup.
And while I am certainly not a
On 13 June 2010 07:02, Boris Shingarov wrote:
> "Your post is absolutely unnecessary"
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-u...@gnu.org/msg52334.html
That comment wasn't directed at Jiříi; it was part of a reply to David Kastrup.
Regards,
Neil
___
Hi Graham and all Lilyponders,
I was quite astonished to hear that my slides were understood to mean
anything pessimistic or negative. If they give people this impression,
then it is a defect of the slides which I will fix.
But right now, let me address some of the apparent misunderstandings
12 matches
Mail list logo
