John Mandereau writes:
> Il giorno ven, 29/06/2012 alle 11.00 +, gra...@percival-music.ca ha
> scritto:
>> LGTM, I think. I'm not completely certain what I'm reviewing here.
>>
>> I'm content to have this (whatever it is) go through, but in the future
>> could you:
>> - keep you changes in
Il giorno ven, 29/06/2012 alle 11.00 +, gra...@percival-music.ca ha
scritto:
> LGTM, I think. I'm not completely certain what I'm reviewing here.
>
> I'm content to have this (whatever it is) go through, but in the future
> could you:
> - keep you changes in a separate git branch (locally)
>
LGTM, I think. I'm not completely certain what I'm reviewing here.
I'm content to have this (whatever it is) go through, but in the future
could you:
- keep you changes in a separate git branch (locally)
- run: git cl upload origin/master
while on that local git branch.
Yes, this will "squis
Reviewers: Graham Percival,
Message:
I'm on submitting another patchset (later tonight).
http://codereview.appspot.com/6354044/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6354044/diff/1/Documen
LGTM. One tweak, then it can be pushed directly to staging.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6354044/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6354044/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/administra
