Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 08:33:27AM +0100, James wrote:
>> If I notice one - Mike S for instance - not picking on him especially
>> but in the olden days when he was 'quick-patch-McMike', and when I was
>> checking patches manually, I'd fix the tracker myself as I could s
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 08:33:27AM +0100, James wrote:
> If I notice one - Mike S for instance - not picking on him especially
> but in the olden days when he was 'quick-patch-McMike', and when I was
> checking patches manually, I'd fix the tracker myself as I could see
> who was the Rietveld owner
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:20:08PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
> When a countdown completes, I mark the tracker item "patch-push" and
> Google dutifully sends the resulting email to lilypond-auto, where
> it formerly went to -devel.
It formely went to bug-lilypond.
> I wonder if the owners are g
Colin,
On 4 April 2012 04:20, Colin Campbell wrote:
> When a countdown completes, I mark the tracker item "patch-push" and Google
> dutifully sends the resulting email to lilypond-auto, where it formerly went
> to -devel. I wonder if the owners are getting the notification, and if so,
> how we h
When a countdown completes, I mark the tracker item "patch-push" and
Google dutifully sends the resulting email to lilypond-auto, where it
formerly went to -devel. I wonder if the owners are getting the
notification, and if so, how we handle those tracker items which do not
have an owner?
Ch
