On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:14:24AM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
> To amplify my reply to Federico: if developers create similar
> tracker items and attach a trivial patch without creating a Rietveld
> issue, it would be very helpful if they would update the tracker
> item as "patch-new" or perhaps
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 06:54:45AM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
> On 12-04-20 12:36 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> >can you please tell me if it's normal that my patch has been ignored?
> >It's a very trivial patch, maybe I didn't follow the right procedure?
Hi Federico,
Please follow this procedure
Colin Campbell writes:
> To amplify my reply to Federico: if developers create similar tracker
> items and attach a trivial patch without creating a Rietveld issue, it
> would be very helpful if they would update the tracker item as
> "patch-new" or perhaps even as "patch-review". I recognise th
On 12-04-20 06:54 AM, Colin Campbell wrote:
Hello, Federico
I've put your patch straight onto the countdown, and it may be that
one of the senior developers will give the OK to push it without
further review.
The reason it was overlooked is that, yes, you did go a bit outside
the usual cha
On 12-04-20 12:36 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
Il 20/04/2012 04:31, Colin Campbell ha scritto:
Echoing Graham's comment on the pace of development slowing, we have no
patches to push, none on countdown and none to review.
Hi Colin,
can you please tell me if it's normal that my patch has been ig
Echoing Graham's comment on the pace of development slowing, we have no
patches to push, none on countdown and none to review.
Enjoy a weekend off, all!
Colin
--
I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catcher's mitt on both
hands.
You need to be able to throw something back.
-
