Re: Only GCC <= 4.1.2 is suitable for current 2.11 on x86 32 bits

2008-05-25 Thread John Mandereau
On 2008/05/24, Valentin Villenave wrote: > 2008/5/24 Francisco Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > My Gcc version is 4.2.3 (standard in Ubuntu 8.04) and I compile well, > > send me a test file or whatever if you want to know if my output is > > correct. I needn't send you any test file, input files in

Re: Only GCC <= 4.1.2 is suitable for current 2.11 on x86 32 bits

2008-05-24 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/5/24 Francisco Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > My Gcc version is 4.2.3 (standard in Ubuntu 8.04) and I compile well, > send me a test file or whatever if you want to know if my output is > correct. Same here; I'm using exclusively a GCC-4.2.3 home-made LilyPond (merging master and dev/rune), so

Re: Only GCC <= 4.1.2 is suitable for current 2.11 on x86 32 bits

2008-05-24 Thread Francisco Vila
My Gcc version is 4.2.3 (standard in Ubuntu 8.04) and I compile well, send me a test file or whatever if you want to know if my output is correct. 2008/5/24 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > After the patch I sent last Sunday to make LilyPond work when compiled > with GCC 4.3.0 x86, I

Only GCC <= 4.1.2 is suitable for current 2.11 on x86 32 bits

2008-05-24 Thread John Mandereau
Hi, After the patch I sent last Sunday to make LilyPond work when compiled with GCC 4.3.0 x86, I noticed that many formatting details were completely screwed up (strange skyline spacing, overlapping staves, irregular horizontal spacing). There are less formatting oddities when compiling with GCC