Hi everybody,
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> - Maybe fix Jazz chords (there's been a lot of complaints, but
>basically no code to do this. Perhaps not.)
In the 1.3.x stages of Lilypond, I developed a working jazz chord algorithm
that:
a) took everything that is halfway common practice into acc
Juergen Reuter wrote:
> Pragmatically seen, in most of the piano music (especially after the
> period of baroque), I would say, you are definitely right, because the
> pianist usually reads all "voices" simultaneously.
More or less simultaneously. If conducting from a piano score, it is
adva
Citat Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How much would it break the Lilypond architecture to keep the
> Accidenal_engraver in the Staff context but making it aware of
> which accidental belongs to which voice, so it still could handle
> each voice separately if the user requests so in some pr
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > This has two disadvantages;
> > - it looks fairly cryptical if you are unfamiliar to
> > the inner workings of Lilypond
> > - you specify the same behaviour for the whole score.
> > For single exceptions it's easy to add extra accidentals
> > with cis! (forc
Citat David Raleigh Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No but the same intolerance of ambiguity dictates that this:
>
> < \key c \major
>\context Voice=va { fis a }
>\context Voice=vb { d fis } >
>
>
> should require two sharp signs whether the parts are on the same staff
>
> or not.
Y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This has two disadvantages;
> - it looks fairly cryptical if you are unfamiliar to
> the inner workings of Lilypond
> - you specify the same behaviour for the whole score.
> For single exceptions it's easy to add extra accidentals
> with cis! (forced accidentals
>
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Rune Zedeler wrote:
>
> > Citat David Raleigh Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > The persistence of accidentals should be a voice context and not a staff
> > > context issue. For whatever reason, this did not come through clearly
> > > from the big discussion of th
Rune Zedeler wrote:
> You don't REALLY mean, that the f in
>
> < \key c \major
> \context Voice=va { fis a }
> \context Voice=vb { d f } >
>
> should not get natural sign, do you?
No but the same intolerance of ambiguity dictates that this:
< \key c \major
\context Voice=va { fis a
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Rune Zedeler wrote:
> Citat David Raleigh Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > The persistence of accidentals should be a voice context and not a staff
> > context issue. For whatever reason, this did not come through clearly
> > from the big discussion of the subject. It is
Citat David Raleigh Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The persistence of accidentals should be a voice context and not a staff
> context issue. For whatever reason, this did not come through clearly
> from the big discussion of the subject. It is a good idea to consider
> any music with more than o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > - small spacing issues (I've got some things that I still want to
> >improve)
> c2 c4 simultaneous with c4 c2 is not a small issue, it's awful. If you
> would space that as if it were three columns of quarter notes the
> problem would not exist. This has bee
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> - small spacing issues (I've got some things that I still want to
>improve)
c2 c4 simultaneous with c4 c2 is not a small issue, it's awful. If you
would space that as if it were three columns of quarter notes the
problem would not e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > - More things? I have about 160 undealt messages from the past year
> >in my lilypond-user mailbox. Maybe someone could cull the useful
> >suggestions from lilypond-user into some sort of TODO list (perhaps
> >on the wiki.)
>
> Is http://lilypond.org/w
>I was wondering: are there many people that enter articulation and
>notes separately?
Quite often I add general annotations such as tempo changes,
ritardando ... separately using text scripts on spacing notes.
This makes it easy to typeset both scores and separate parts.
I could also i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > It's amazing how much we have achieved in two and a half years!
> >
> > http://web.archive.org/web/19991003222858/http://www.lilypond.org/
> >
> > innit sweet?
>
> Yes, 'Tis. :-)
>
> It's all too easy sometimes to get a bit disenchanted when I see how
> much work is
Rune Zedeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's amazing how much we have achieved in two and a half years!
>
> http://web.archive.org/web/19991003222858/http://www.lilypond.org/
>
> innit sweet?
Yes, 'Tis. :-)
It's all too easy sometimes to get a bit disenchanted when I see how
much work is sti
It's amazing how much we have achieved in two and a half years!
http://web.archive.org/web/19991003222858/http://www.lilypond.org/
innit sweet?
-Rune
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-dev
17 matches
Mail list logo
