On Oct 25, 2014, at 17:59 , Simon Albrecht wrote:
>
> Hello Dan,
>
> I think the double c and double cut c symbols are very much non-standard,
> unlike single cut c for 4/2, which I consider to be in use very widely.
Simon,
A few weeks ago, I added a new time signature style named "single-C”
Am 26.10.2014 um 01:43 schrieb Dan Eble:
On Oct 25, 2014, at 17:59 , Simon Albrecht wrote:
I think the double c and double cut c symbols are very much non-standard,
unlike single cut c for 4/2, which I consider to be in use very widely. With
this difference in frequency of use I don’t find
Hello Dan,
I think the double c and double cut c symbols are very much
non-standard, unlike single cut c for 4/2, which I consider to be in use
very widely. With this difference in frequency of use I don’t find your
suggestion convincing.
What made me suggest the 'style option is the strong an
On Oct 25, 2014, at 17:59 , Simon Albrecht wrote:
>
> I think the double c and double cut c symbols are very much non-standard,
> unlike single cut c for 4/2, which I consider to be in use very widely. With
> this difference in frequency of use I don’t find your suggestion convincing.
My sugge
Simon (and all),
Regarding the request to display 4/2 as cut-c by default,
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3286
I think it would make sense to extend the default style to offer a simple way
to get the doubled symbols:
2/1 -> double cut-c (Schubert op. 90 no. 3)
4/2 -
