Thanks. I'll send in my triangle, which may meet my needs, and let
you do whatever you need.
Maximilian Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kevin Dalley schrieb:
>> Jamie,
>>
>> I have a downward-pointing triangle now, which is the reverse of the
>> do. However, it isn't exactly what you want
Kevin Dalley schrieb:
> Jamie,
>
> I have a downward-pointing triangle now, which is the reverse of the
> do. However, it isn't exactly what you want. It is isosceles, though
> I don't think that it is equilateral.
I think Trevor mentioned a while ago that (one of) the existing
triangle(s) wou
