Re: New git cl :: rebase patches

2011-10-05 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 04:08:45PM +0200, Julien Rioux wrote: > I guess most of us don't have any privilege to change this status on > googlepage. Actually, we try to give this privilege to everybody -- google code doesn't allow us to make it actually available to the whole world, but we add peopl

Re: New git cl :: rebase patches

2011-10-04 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2011, 16:21:50 schrieb m...@apollinemike.com: > On Oct 4, 2011, at 4:08 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: > > I guess most of us don't have any privilege to change this status on > > googlepage. Moreover, it seems to me that Mike's use-case was simply to > > store his patch somewhere

Re: New git cl :: rebase patches

2011-10-04 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On Oct 4, 2011, at 4:08 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: > On 04/10/2011 3:04 PM, Colin Campbell wrote: >> On 11-10-04 02:48 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >>> Hey all, >>> >>> I uploaded a couple patches to Rietveld this morning just to have >>> clean diffs with current master (my bazillion commits on

Re: New git cl :: rebase patches

2011-10-04 Thread Julien Rioux
On 04/10/2011 3:04 PM, Colin Campbell wrote: On 11-10-04 02:48 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: Hey all, I uploaded a couple patches to Rietveld this morning just to have clean diffs with current master (my bazillion commits on my local branch won't apply to current master anymore). I then down

Re: New git cl :: rebase patches

2011-10-04 Thread Colin Campbell
On 11-10-04 02:48 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: Hey all, I uploaded a couple patches to Rietveld this morning just to have clean diffs with current master (my bazillion commits on my local branch won't apply to current master anymore). I then download this diff and run the regtests. Howe

Re: New git cl :: rebase patches

2011-10-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:48:57AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > I think that the new git cl should ask the uploader > if she wants a patch to be labeled patch new instead of doing it > automatically so that James doesn't run regtests on patches that > could be buggy. What about using gi

New git cl :: rebase patches

2011-10-04 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
Hey all, I uploaded a couple patches to Rietveld this morning just to have clean diffs with current master (my bazillion commits on my local branch won't apply to current master anymore). I then download this diff and run the regtests. However, with the new git cl, James sees patch_new and al