Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
NR 1.5 (simultaneous):
Developers (Mats?) can you see if I covered all the known issues with
\partcombine?
Sorry, I've never used \partcombine myself, so the only thing
I know about it is that people have different complaints every
now and then.
/Mats
Patrick McCarty wrote Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: NR 1.5 and 1.6 reviewed
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:14:25AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/10/2 Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In the third musical example under "Instrument names" (.it
2008/10/2 Francisco Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I cannot find this post, and I'm interested in you review of 1.5
> simultaneous. Where did you send to? Please, post me a copy, thank
> you.
It has been rejected by the mailing list since the attachments were too heavy.
Andrew's corrections have be
2008/10/2 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/10/2 Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> After much delay, I finished reviewing the text of NR 1.5 and 1.6
>> (attached). Overall, it was very informative and well written. Here I
>> only mention those changes that warrant discussion, or
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:14:25AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2008/10/2 Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > In the third musical example under "Instrument names" (.itely lines
> > 963–977), why is "Flute" not centered above "Clarinetti / in B(flat)"?
>
> I don't know.
lilypond-book u
2008/10/2 Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> After much delay, I finished reviewing the text of NR 1.5 and 1.6
> (attached). Overall, it was very informative and well written. Here I
> only mention those changes that warrant discussion, or questions I
> had.
Great! If you don't know what to do
