Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2017-09-24 Thread pkx166h
On 2017/09/24 15:34:15, Jean-Charles wrote: On 2017/09/24 14:20:08, pkx166h wrote: > Corrected the Note styles. Added more formatting changes. Would you mind formatting the "Standard clefs" as well, which would then "group" G, C and F-clefs and have a more pleasant layout? Pas de problème!

Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2017-09-24 Thread pkx166h
On 2017/09/24 18:02:11, benko.pal wrote: Hello James, > I took a bit of time to educate myself with Ancient notation and have, > hopefully, picked the correct note styles now. > > Should I use the red 4-line-staff for the rest of the examples or just > for the Gregorian clefs? Just for

Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2017-09-24 Thread pkx166h
On 2017/09/24 14:52:07, lemzwerg wrote: > Should I use the red 4-line-staff for the rest > of the examples or just for the Gregorian clefs? Red four-line staves should be probably used for Gregorian only. However, I'm not an expert, so maybe others have a more educated opinion. Two other

Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2017-09-24 Thread Benkő Pál
Hello James, > I took a bit of time to educate myself with Ancient notation and have, > hopefully, picked the correct note styles now. > > Should I use the red 4-line-staff for the rest of the examples or just > for the Gregorian clefs? Just for the Gregorian clefs. Mensural clefs, as the C-clef

Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2017-09-24 Thread lilyfan
On 2017/09/24 14:20:08, pkx166h wrote: Corrected the Note styles. Added more formatting changes. Would you mind formatting the "Standard clefs" as well, which would then "group" G, C and F-clefs and have a more pleasant layout? https://codereview.appspot.com/324420043/ ___

Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2017-09-24 Thread lemzwerg
Should I use the red 4-line-staff for the rest of the examples or just for the Gregorian clefs? Red four-line staves should be probably used for Gregorian only. However, I'm not an expert, so maybe others have a more educated opinion. Two other problems. * For Hufnagel clefs you should also us

Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2017-09-24 Thread pkx166h
On 2017/09/24 14:27:05, pkx166h wrote: @Phil @Benko I took a bit of time to educate myself with Ancient notation and have, hopefully, picked the correct note styles now. Should I use the red 4-line-staff for the rest of the examples or just for the Gregorian clefs? https://cloud.woelkli

Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2017-09-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> https://cloud.woelkli.com/s/dBGXat0NEGVoy5C This link doesn't work (`Invalid PDF structure'). Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2017-09-24 Thread pkx166h
@Phil @Benko I took a bit of time to educate myself with Ancient notation and have, hopefully, picked the correct note styles now. Should I use the red 4-line-staff for the rest of the examples or just for the Gregorian clefs? https://cloud.woelkli.com/s/dBGXat0NEGVoy5C This is a 300kb PDF of

Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2017-09-12 Thread pkx166h
Note to self. https://codereview.appspot.com/324420043/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely File Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely (left): https://codereview.appspot.com/324420043/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely#oldcode1484 Docum