What is the status of porting NoteEdit to Windows?
Matevz Jekovec wrote:
>
>
>>xml2ly is:
>>If anybody has already tried xml2ly and got it to run properly, why are
they
>>not satisfied with it? Is it because the "necessary basic" is more than
just
>>the (claimed) features of the converter? It
>xml2ly is:
>If anybody has already tried xml2ly and got it to run properly, why are they
>not satisfied with it? Is it because the "necessary basic" is more than just
>the (claimed) features of the converter? It supposedly can do:
>multi-parts score
>multi-voices parts
>multi-staves parts (piano
