2012/12/11 Graham Percival :
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:36:19PM +0100, Federico Bruni wrote:
>> Il 10/12/2012 22:22, Thomas Morley ha scritto:
>> >You can see the patch at
>> >http://codereview.appspot.com/6923043/
>> >but no issue on the tracker was generated.
>> >Colin, I'm sorry about that.
>>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:36:19PM +0100, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il 10/12/2012 22:22, Thomas Morley ha scritto:
> >You can see the patch at
> >http://codereview.appspot.com/6923043/
> >but no issue on the tracker was generated.
> >Colin, I'm sorry about that.
>
> AFAIK, you should first create th
2012/12/10 Federico Bruni :
> Il 10/12/2012 22:22, Thomas Morley ha scritto:
>
>> You can see the patch at
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/6923043/
>> but no issue on the tracker was generated.
>> Colin, I'm sorry about that.
>>
>
> AFAIK, you should first create the issue and then upload the patc
Il 10/12/2012 22:22, Thomas Morley ha scritto:
You can see the patch at
http://codereview.appspot.com/6923043/
but no issue on the tracker was generated.
Colin, I'm sorry about that.
AFAIK, you should first create the issue and then upload the patch.
git-cl is able to recognize which issue is
Hi,
I created a patch (about removing '-signs in vectors). Therefore I
used a new, separate branch (the first time I tried this).
While uploading the patch to Rietveld I did sth wrong:
You can see the patch at
http://codereview.appspot.com/6923043/
but no issue on the tracker was generated.
Colin
