Milan Zamazal wrote:
"NS" == Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NS> Using in Emacs 22.0.50.1, I applied the following patch.
The following additional patch seems to be needed to avoid an error in
post-command-hook:
-
> "NS" == Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NS> Using in Emacs 22.0.50.1, I applied the following patch.
The following additional patch seems to be needed to avoid an error in
post-command-hook:
--- lilypond0/lilypond-font-lock.el 2005-10-13 11:12:36.0 +0200
+++ lilypond
On 12/10/05, Heikki Johannes Junes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:42:37 +0200 Jan Buchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Seems like 21.4 is the current stable release, and I have not used CVS Emacs.Therefore, patches for LilyPond's Emacs files are welcome. The type of changes
needed be
Heikki Johannes Junes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:42:37 +0200 Jan Buchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> we develop Free Software for blind and we have several blind users
>> who use Emacs Lilypond mode.
>
> This is a good thing.
>
>> Now we have problem wit
> "HJJ" == Heikki Johannes Junes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
HJJ> On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:42:37 +0200 Jan Buchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> we develop Free Software for blind and we have several blind
>> users who use Emacs Lilypond mode.
HJJ> This is
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:42:37 +0200 Jan Buchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we develop Free Software for blind and we have several blind users
> who use Emacs Lilypond mode.
This is a good thing.
> Now we have problem with Lilypond mode
> and CVS Emacs. In Emacs 22.xx are changed som
