Re: Lilypond 2.0.1 built ok for FreeBSD 4.0 w/gcc 2.95.2

2003-11-23 Thread Patrick Atamaniuk
R. D. Davis([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2003.11.19 22:59:56 +: > Actually, I'm going to have to install it on partition other than > /usr, due to space limitations, so installing from ports may not be a > good idea for me anyway. It's always been my preference to intall I do the same followint way: e

Re: Lilypond 2.0.1 built ok for FreeBSD 4.0 w/gcc 2.95.2

2003-11-20 Thread R. D. Davis
Quothe R. D. Davis, from writings of Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:59:56PM -0500: > Has anyone else run into this problem with ImageMagick? Yes, I know that replying to one's own message isn't considered a good thing. :-) ...however, in case anyone else has any problem installing ImageMagick in order to

Re: Lilypond 2.0.1 built ok for FreeBSD 4.0 w/gcc 2.95.2

2003-11-19 Thread R. D. Davis
Hi, thanks for the reply and info. about gcc 3.3. However, installing from ports doesn't seem to work. Usually installing gcc isn't much of a problem (well, on other systems it wasn't), but this time, I ran into a problem compiling it. What I'm going to try is deleting gcc3.3.2, download 3.3.3,

Re: Lilypond 2.0.1 built ok for FreeBSD 4.0 w/gcc 2.95.2

2003-11-18 Thread R. D. Davis
Quothe Jan Nieuwenhuizen, from writings of Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:34:23AM +0100: > Yes, but please keep this on the list. Will do. Thanks for the reminder. > > ImportError: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3: Undefined symbol "__ti9exception" > > This is quite strange. It looks like a gcc installation p

Re: Lilypond 2.0.1 built ok for FreeBSD 4.0 w/gcc 2.95.2

2003-11-18 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
"R. D. Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for the reply. Yes, but please keep this on the list. > Alas, switching to g++ 3.x doesn't appear to be a possibility This may not be very important, but see other post to list. > That's what I thought. :-) You may want to see/post what check

Re: Lilypond 2.0.1 built ok for FreeBSD 4.0 w/gcc 2.95.2

2003-11-17 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
"R. D. Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A few comments about the 2.0.1 release, which I just built > successfully for FreeBSD 4.0 with gcc/g++ 2.95.2 (yep, no need to > upgrade to 3.x); I just hacked the config script to ignore checking > the version, since this was the same for Lilypond 1.8,