On Friday 19 November 2004 14:52, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> I've added the Doxygen file to CVS. I'm willing to add doxygen rules
> to the makefile, if someone writes them.
Unfortunately, I'm not proficient with 'autoconf', so I can't provide a
working solution right now. But here's what I've got
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hello list,
>
> Has anyone considered to apply Doxygen to the LilyPond sources? I'm aware
> that the internal comments are not doxygen'erated, however, Doxygen is
> capable to analyze plain C/C++ codes and to generate at least rudimentary
> "documentation" in variou
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> there were some good intentions, but not much has happened.
Apart from Carl Sorensen, who started a programming concepts document
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-10/msg00241.html
which is not the same thing, but it's related.
Jan.
--
Jan
Andreas Scherer writes:
> Has anyone considered to apply Doxygen to the LilyPond sources?
See these threads
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-03/msg00226.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-04/msg00083.html
there were some good intentions, but not
Hello list,
Has anyone considered to apply Doxygen to the LilyPond sources? I'm aware
that the internal comments are not doxygen'erated, however, Doxygen is
capable to analyze plain C/C++ codes and to generate at least rudimentary
"documentation" in various output formats.
One of the major ad
