[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>
> > I'm following those changes with mild interest, waiting whether it
> > really is as promising as you say. Compare this with your enthusiasm
> > for C++ at the beginning...
>
> Don't worry, we have seen the light! After the move to SCons,
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> I'm following those changes with mild interest, waiting whether it
> really is as promising as you say. Compare this with your enthusiasm
> for C++ at the beginning...
Don't worry, we have seen the light! After the move to SCons, we'll
start the grand rewrite in TOM (or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > To spur the adoption of LilyPond 2.3, I have decided to give 2.3 yet
> > another bonus-point over 2.2. The latest development release sports
> > the long-awaited rewrite of the slur code.
>
> This might indeed be a reason to switch. What about backporting? :-)
Yes
> In fact, one of our regular contributor was recently seen
> recommending 2.2 over 2.3. This is, of course, heresy.
:-)
> To spur the adoption of LilyPond 2.3, I have decided to give 2.3 yet
> another bonus-point over 2.2. The latest development release sports
> the long-awaited rewrite of the
