Nicolas Sceaux writes:
> OK, of course. Even if the internals will change, the interface, which
> is still simple, can be documented. I'm beginning a draft.
Good.
> a possible explanation for NEWS.texi:
Ok, please install this.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - T
> a possible explanation for NEWS.texi:
>
>* LilyPond expressions can be embedded into Scheme, thanks to the
> `#{ ... #}' syntax. Within such a block, Scheme forms, for
> instance variable names, can be introduced thanks to a `$'
> character (`$$' has to be used to issue a sing
Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:55:23 +0200, Jan a dit :
> Looks good. When you feel this has fleshed out, there should be some
> documentation (but I'm still `waiting' for the \book stuff to
> stabilize before writing real documentation, eg).
OK, of course. Even if the internals will change, the interf
Nicolas Sceaux writes:
> It's commited. I hope I have not messed up things with CVS (first time
> I use it...)
Looks good. When you feel this has fleshed out, there should be some
documentation (but I'm still `waiting' for the \book stuff to
stabilize before writing real documentation, eg).
May
Sun, 25 Apr 2004 19:19:51 +0200, Jan a dit :
> Yes. I think it's very good to have it in CVS as soon as it's sane,
> we'll just change it again if we know how to do something better.
It's commited. I hope I have not messed up things with CVS (first time
I use it...)
nicolas
_
Nicolas Sceaux writes:
> You can't know how happy I am with it :-) really.
Yes, me too. This really looks as a great step for even better ly/scm
integration, with possibly (hopefully) unthinkable possibilities. You
really amazed me with your (albeit kludgy first) solution, I didn't
know that wa
Sun, 25 Apr 2004 17:00:49 +0200, Jan a dit :
> Nicolas Sceaux writes:
>> ly:parse-string is definitely a wonderful feature.
> Well, you're to blame that we have it ;-)
You can't know how happy I am with it :-) really. Though it's a
beautiful day here in Bordeaux, I can't help going back to m
Nicolas Sceaux writes:
> ly:parse-string is definitely a wonderful feature.
Well, you're to blame that we have it ;-)
> Here is a cleaner
> version of a #{ ... #} lilypond syntax inside scheme.
Cool; do you want to add this to CVS?
> (list->string (map (lambda
Hi,
ly:parse-string is definitely a wonderful feature. Here is a cleaner
version of a #{ ... #} lilypond syntax inside scheme.
%%% scm/lily-in-scm.scm %%
(define-module (scm lily-in-scm))
(use-modules (ice-9 format) (lily))
(define (gen-lily-sym) '())
(let ((var-idx -1))
(
