Re: LSR texidocs missing -es suffix

2010-05-08 Thread Francisco Vila
2010/5/7 Neil Puttock : > On 4 May 2010 23:49, Francisco Vila wrote: >> If your patch looks for texidoc= alone and not for texidoc[lang]= etc >> any more, we should change all texidoc[lang]= string names in all >> [lang]/texidocs snippets, for every [lang]. > > It only touches .texidoc files which

Re: LSR texidocs missing -es suffix

2010-05-07 Thread Neil Puttock
On 4 May 2010 23:49, Francisco Vila wrote: > Yes, putting the suffix had only sense when the same file (located in > input/texidocs) mixed various translations, now they are kept away in > our lang/ directories. Ah yes, I'd completely forgotten they used to be lumped together. > If your patch l

Re: LSR texidocs missing -es suffix

2010-05-05 Thread Francisco Vila
2010/5/4 Neil Puttock : > Hi Francisco, > > Your last set of LSR texidocs included several missing the -es suffix. Argh! Thank you. They were all the new snippets, never translated before. >  I've pushed a fix for this, but wondered whether it's worth getting > makelsr.py to do this automatically

LSR texidocs missing -es suffix

2010-05-05 Thread Neil Puttock
Hi Francisco, Your last set of LSR texidocs included several missing the -es suffix. I've pushed a fix for this, but wondered whether it's worth getting makelsr.py to do this automatically (http://codereview.appspot.com/1105042/show). Cheers, Neil __