Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:16:37 -0700
> Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Magnificent!
>>
>> Trivial word: s/operating/operation/
>>
>
> Thanks. BTW, the actual syntax is s/before/after/, but I got the
> meaning. :)
>
Doh! I really did know that workin
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:16:37 -0700
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Magnificent!
>
> Trivial word: s/operating/operation/
Thanks. BTW, the actual syntax is s/before/after/, but I got the
meaning. :)
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel maili
Graham Percival wrote:
> I think I've finished LM 1 Introduction -- in particular LM 1.2
> About the documentation.
>
> Could people check it out, make sure that what I've written there
> matches with their idea of the doc organization, check that I
> haven't missed anything, etc?
>
> http://kainho
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:27 AM
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:54:24 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 21, 2008 10:02 PM
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:43:15 +0200
> John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> What about "General
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:54:24 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 21, 2008 10:02 PM
>
> > On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:43:15 +0200
> > John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> What about "General input and output"?
> >
> > I could go with th
Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 21, 2008 10:02 PM
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:43:15 +0200
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2008/07/21 00:37 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> I'd say either "General notation" or "Non-musical notation",
> leaning slightly towards the former. Anybody
John Mandereau wrote Monday, July 21, 2008 9:43 PM
On 2008/07/21 00:37 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We'll have to find something - the section is certainly
> not Input syntax!
I'd say either "General notation" or "Non-musical notation",
leani
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:43:15 +0200
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008/07/21 00:37 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > I'd say either "General notation" or "Non-musical notation",
> > leaning slightly towards the former. Anybody else have thoughts
> > on this?
>
> What about "Ge
On 2008/07/21 00:37 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We'll have to find something - the section is certainly
> > not Input syntax!
> Well, it /was/ called "non-musical notation" before we started
> GDP. I'm not saying that we can't go back to it, tho
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:17:23 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote Sunday, July 20, 2008 11:42 PM
>
> > If we hadn't used "fundamental" already, I might suggest that.
> > "Basic notation" implies easy stuff, not to mention the fact that
> > it was used as such
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, July 20, 2008 11:42 PM
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:22:45 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, I'd still like to change the heading, "Input syntax" to
something else. My current favourite is "Other notation" as this
follows nicely after the first t
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:22:45 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks pretty good in general; a few minor suggestions in attached
> patch.
Thanks, applied.
> Also, I'd still like to change the heading, "Input syntax" to
> something else. My current favourite is "Other notation"
and providing a catch-all for
anything else in the future. So far no comments to this suggestion on -user
:(
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lily-devel"
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 10:19 PM
Subject: GDP:
I think I've finished LM 1 Introduction -- in particular LM 1.2
About the documentation.
Could people check it out, make sure that what I've written there
matches with their idea of the doc organization, check that I
haven't missed anything, etc?
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/
14 matches
Mail list logo
