Pushed to staging as f955789f..0fa48c98
http://codereview.appspot.com/5343050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Adam Spiers writes:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:21 AM, wrote:
>> As far as I can see, this patch is approved for pushing, but hasn't been
>> pushed yet.
>>
>> Are you going to push it, Adam, or should I push the one that I have?
>
> I will do it now. I guess I have to rebase each branch off st
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:21 AM, wrote:
> As far as I can see, this patch is approved for pushing, but hasn't been
> pushed yet.
>
> Are you going to push it, Adam, or should I push the one that I have?
I will do it now. I guess I have to rebase each branch off staging
and then push, right?
__
As far as I can see, this patch is approved for pushing, but hasn't been
pushed yet.
Are you going to push it, Adam, or should I push the one that I have?
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/5343050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-
On 11/7/11 2:48 PM, "Adam Spiers" wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 08:13:46PM +, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com
>>wrote:
>>> I am not in favor of the tab-to-space change in
>>> scm/chord-ignatzek-names.scm, since we don't yet have agreemen
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:11 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> In this case, the damage is already done, so there seems little point in
> investing the effort for trying to get back again.
Especially considering my first patch submission did *not* have
gratuitous whitespace changes, and I only put them
Adam Spiers writes:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 08:13:46PM +, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I am not in favor of the tab-to-space change in
>>> scm/chord-ignatzek-names.scm, since we don't yet have agreement on
>>> removing tab
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 08:13:46PM +, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I am not in favor of the tab-to-space change in
>> scm/chord-ignatzek-names.scm, since we don't yet have agreement on
>> removing tabs from .scm files, AFAICS.
>
>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 08:13:46PM +, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am not in favor of the tab-to-space change in
> scm/chord-ignatzek-names.scm, since we don't yet have agreement on
> removing tabs from .scm files, AFAICS.
True, but I assume that other parts of the patch set depend on
Passes make but two reg test diffs - see
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1503#c32
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5343050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-d
I am not in favor of the tab-to-space change in
scm/chord-ignatzek-names.scm, since we don't yet have agreement on
removing tabs from .scm files, AFAICS.
However, if nobody else is worried about it, I won't complain. I'd
prefer to have the tabs gone. And if we can do it through the backdoor,
I'
11 matches
Mail list logo
