On 2016/06/05 18:18:23, ht wrote:
This looks great!
Even though this question has little relevance to these code changes,
I can't
resist asking whether you might have ideas about the best way to fix
the
"reverse" problem of ties attached to *individual notes of a chord*
ending up
ignored
This looks great!
Even though this question has little relevance to these code changes, I
can't resist asking whether you might have ideas about the best way to
fix the "reverse" problem of ties attached to *individual notes of a
chord* ending up ignored when processing articulations using the
ar
LGTM. Thanks for implementing this.
https://codereview.appspot.com/298330043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel