On 2013/01/10 09:21:33, mike7 wrote:
On 10 janv. 2013, at 10:19, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
> On 2013/01/10 09:05:21, mike7 wrote:
>
>> It's actually not as bad as you'd think. The Hara_kiri_engraver is
> just a thin
>> wrapper around the Axi_group_engraver. Everything can be switched
on
>
On 10 janv. 2013, at 10:19, d...@gnu.org wrote:
> On 2013/01/10 09:05:21, mike7 wrote:
>
>> It's actually not as bad as you'd think. The Hara_kiri_engraver is
> just a thin
>> wrapper around the Axi_group_engraver. Everything can be switched on
> and off
>> via an extra context property haraKi
On 2013/01/10 09:05:21, mike7 wrote:
It's actually not as bad as you'd think. The Hara_kiri_engraver is
just a thin
wrapper around the Axi_group_engraver. Everything can be switched on
and off
via an extra context property haraKiri. I was able to drum up a
sketch in 10
minutes. Running
On 10 janv. 2013, at 07:40, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
> Anything with a line break still causes a crash. I can't say exactly
> why, because I'm a bit confused which VerticalAxisGroup gets removed,
> the outer or the inner.
>
> \new StaffGroup \with { \RemoveEmptyStaves
> } << { b1 b1 b1}
>
Reviewers: Keith,
Message:
On 2013/01/10 06:40:08, Keith wrote:
Anything with a line break still causes a crash. I can't say exactly
why,
because I'm a bit confused which VerticalAxisGroup gets removed, the
outer or
the inner.
The outer group commits suicide once it hears of an inner one.
Anything with a line break still causes a crash. I can't say exactly
why, because I'm a bit confused which VerticalAxisGroup gets removed,
the outer or the inner.
\new StaffGroup \with { \RemoveEmptyStaves
} << { b1 b1 b1}
{ b1 b1 \break b1 } >>
My only suggestion is to merge "Axis_g
