Werner
On 05/11/2019 21:27, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
It's not a regression, right.
My first probably-not-very-correct thing to do next was check out
stable/2.18 and make LP from there (on the same system am building
latest master on) and search for the same errors. [...]
So is this a regression?
>> It's not a regression, right.
>
> My first probably-not-very-correct thing to do next was check out
> stable/2.18 and make LP from there (on the same system am building
> latest master on) and search for the same errors. [...]
>
> So is this a regression?
My answer is still no. Our glyph sh
>> Now that Dan has made default make commands 'terser' I am noticing
>> while building our fonts that I see quite a few 'errors' that look
>> like this:
>>
>> Internal Error (overlap) in clefs.petrucci.c5_change:
>> Winding number did not return to 0 when x=25.9951
>> Internal Error (overlap)
On 05/11/2019 12:06, David Kastrup wrote:
James writes:
Hello,
Now that Dan has made default make commands 'terser' I am noticing
while building our fonts that I see quite a few 'errors' that look
like this:
Internal Error (overlap) in clefs.petrucci.c5_change: Winding number
did not return
James writes:
> Hello,
>
> Now that Dan has made default make commands 'terser' I am noticing
> while building our fonts that I see quite a few 'errors' that look
> like this:
>
> Internal Error (overlap) in clefs.petrucci.c5_change: Winding number
> did not return to 0 when x=25.9951
> Internal
Hello,
Now that Dan has made default make commands 'terser' I am noticing while
building our fonts that I see quite a few 'errors' that look like this:
Internal Error (overlap) in clefs.petrucci.c5_change: Winding number did
not return to 0 when x=25.9951
Internal Error (overlap) in clefs.pet
