Re: Include path priority for documentation/snippets

2009-08-04 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/8/2 John Mandereau : > You have surely noticed that this is fixed in Git.  Sorry for the little > delay for fixfing this and for having ignored your patch Neil, I only > remembered you had complained with this but didn't go back to the email > thread to look at your patch, though discussions

Re: Include path priority for documentation/snippets

2009-08-02 Thread John Mandereau
Le mardi 28 juillet 2009 à 21:55 +0100, Neil Puttock a écrit : > I've just done a docs compile and noticed some regression tests > appearing in the snippet list. I've prepared a patch which fixes it, > but I'm wary of pushing it without passing it by you first, since I > know precisely nothing abo

Re: Include path priority for documentation/snippets

2009-07-29 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:57:11PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > 2009/7/29 Graham Percival : > > > We should also move things like font-table.ly and > > chord-names-jazz.ly into LSR.  My initial idea was to have a > > Documentation/charts/ dir, or move them directly into notation/, > > but there's

Re: Include path priority for documentation/snippets

2009-07-29 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/7/29 Graham Percival : > We should also move things like font-table.ly and > chord-names-jazz.ly into LSR.  My initial idea was to have a > Documentation/charts/ dir, or move them directly into notation/, > but there's no harm dumping them in LSR, and that would simplify > the build process.

Re: Include path priority for documentation/snippets

2009-07-29 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:19:07PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > 2009/7/28 Graham Percival : > > > This can (+ should, although it's not a priority) be simplified > > further: all the input-dir stuff should eliminated (including > > regressions). > > Valentin's just added a `headword' tag to LSR,

Re: Include path priority for documentation/snippets

2009-07-29 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/7/28 Graham Percival : > This can (+ should, although it's not a priority) be simplified > further: all the input-dir stuff should eliminated (including > regressions). Valentin's just added a `headword' tag to LSR, so it'll be perfectly feasible to clear out most of input/manual with the ne

Re: Include path priority for documentation/snippets

2009-07-28 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:55:12PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > This prevents identically-named regression tests from shadowing > LSR snippets in the docs (e.g., ambitus.ly). > > diff --git a/make/lilypond-vars.make b/make/lilypond-vars.make > index 126d2c3..72e6f9b 100644 > --- a/make/lilypond-va

Include path priority for documentation/snippets

2009-07-28 Thread Neil Puttock
Hi John, I've just done a docs compile and noticed some regression tests appearing in the snippet list. I've prepared a patch which fixes it, but I'm wary of pushing it without passing it by you first, since I know precisely nothing about makefile hacking. :) Cheers, Neil From bca83b4531abb3bc69