Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> Am Dienstag, dem 06.07.2021 um 17:03 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Jean Abou Samra writes:
>>
>> > For example, if I were the author of the below code, how
>> > would I understand that the mmrest_event_ should be
>> > unprotected?
>> >
>> > void
>> > Part_co
Am Dienstag, dem 06.07.2021 um 17:03 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Jean Abou Samra writes:
>
> > For example, if I were the author of the below code, how
> > would I understand that the mmrest_event_ should be
> > unprotected?
> >
> > void
> > Part_combine_iterator::kill_mmrest (Contex
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> For example, if I were the author of the below code, how
> would I understand that the mmrest_event_ should be
> unprotected?
>
> void
> Part_combine_iterator::kill_mmrest (Context *c)
> {
> if (!mmrest_event_)
> {
> mmrest_event_ = new Stream_event
>
Le 06/07/2021 10:59, David Kastrup <[1]d...@gnu.org> a écrit :
Jean Abou Samra <[2]j...@abou-samra.fr> writes:
Hello,
I am struggling to understand how to write
C++ code that correctly protects and unprotects
smobs from GC. Take this code from lily/grob-pq-engraver.cc:
vo
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Hello,
>
> I am struggling to understand how to write
> C++ code that correctly protects and unprotects
> smobs from GC. Take this code from lily/grob-pq-engraver.cc:
>
> void
> Grob_pq_engraver::process_acknowledged ()
> {
> std::sort (started_now_.begin (), started_n
Hello,
I am struggling to understand how to write
C++ code that correctly protects and unprotects
smobs from GC. Take this code from lily/grob-pq-engraver.cc:
void
Grob_pq_engraver::process_acknowledged ()
{
std::sort (started_now_.begin (), started_now_.end ());
SCM lst = SCM_EOL;
SCM *tai
