Re: Git repository, was Re: doc branching

2006-10-22 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Johannes Schindelin escreveu: Hi, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: I have some more clues now; some of the time stamps in the CVS repo are messed up; eg revision 1.2 of flower/include/GNUmakefile lists 2002 as the year which is clearly wrong. Most definitely this would trigger a

Re: Git repository, was Re: doc branching

2006-10-22 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > I have some more clues now; some of the time stamps in the CVS repo are > messed up; eg revision 1.2 of flower/include/GNUmakefile lists 2002 as > the year which is clearly wrong. Most definitely this would trigger a "bug" in cvsps. I say "bug

Re: Git repository, was Re: doc branching

2006-10-22 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Johannes Schindelin escreveu: Hi, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Interested parties can get the darcs repo at http://lilypond.org/~hanwen/gub-git/ Well, I cannot. As I stated earlier, I gave up on darcs. You can simply wget the directory, which will give you a runnable

Git repository, was Re: doc branching

2006-10-22 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Interested parties can get the darcs repo at > http://lilypond.org/~hanwen/gub-git/ Well, I cannot. As I stated earlier, I gave up on darcs. > however, I seem to have some trouble with importing the CVS repo into > Git. My attempt is at >