Re: GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-20 Thread Graham Percival
Thanks, modified accordingly. Cheers, - Graham On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:26:53PM -0400, Travis Briggs wrote: > The only thing I can tell is that you need to remove the part about > needing python, since (as the doc says) Python is now bundled. > > Other than that, the rest looks accurate and co

Re: GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-19 Thread Travis Briggs
The only thing I can tell is that you need to remove the part about needing python, since (as the doc says) Python is now bundled. Other than that, the rest looks accurate and complete to me. -Travis On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:42:43PM -0

Re: GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-18 Thread Dan Eble
I got this: error: unsupported font format: /Library/Fonts/Optima.ttc and it went away after I removed this line from my file: #(define fonts (make-pango-font-tree "Century Schoolbook L" "Optima" "Mono" 1)) But this works with 2.12.2. Is that expected? Thanks, -- Dan On 2009-09-16,

Re: GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:42:43PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Graham Percival > wrote: > > An initial version of 2.13.4, OSX-x86 version, is available at: > > http://lilypond.org/~graham/ > > > > It's completely untested, and it isn't the real 2.13.4 release,

Re: GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-17 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > An initial version of 2.13.4, OSX-x86 version, is available at: > http://lilypond.org/~graham/ > > It's completely untested, and it isn't the real 2.13.4 release, > but it would be awesome if somebody could test it, so anybody > needed it f

Re: GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-17 Thread Graham Percival
No, it includes the binary. Cheers, - Graham On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:51:20AM -0400, Travis Briggs wrote: > Okay I guess I misunderstood. This is just the OS X GUI frontend...so > I imagine it uses the lilypond binary in my path? > > -Travis > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Travis Briggs

Re: GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-17 Thread Graham Percival
Correct. Cheers, - Graham On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:44:41AM -0400, Travis Briggs wrote: > I have a devel version (that I compiled from scratch), but I didn't > "make install"...I'm running it using the recommended launcher script, > which I put in /opt/local/bin/lilypond > > If I backup that sc

Re: GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-17 Thread Travis Briggs
Okay I guess I misunderstood. This is just the OS X GUI frontend...so I imagine it uses the lilypond binary in my path? -Travis On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Travis Briggs wrote: > I have a devel version (that I compiled from scratch), but I didn't > "make install"...I'm running it using the

Re: GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-17 Thread Travis Briggs
I have a devel version (that I compiled from scratch), but I didn't "make install"...I'm running it using the recommended launcher script, which I put in /opt/local/bin/lilypond If I backup that script, I shouldn't experience any interactions, right? -Travis On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Jon

Re: GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-16 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Graham Percival wrote: An initial version of 2.13.4, OSX-x86 version, is available at: http://lilypond.org/~graham/ It's completely untested, and it isn't the real 2.13.4 release, but it would be awesome if somebody could test it, so anybody needed it for doc building can continue and stuff.

GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-16 Thread Graham Percival
An initial version of 2.13.4, OSX-x86 version, is available at: http://lilypond.org/~graham/ It's completely untested, and it isn't the real 2.13.4 release, but it would be awesome if somebody could test it, so anybody needed it for doc building can continue and stuff. I hope to get a mingw vers