Re: GSoC 2020: backwards compatibility

2020-08-25 Thread Owen Lamb
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 11:45 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > >> Werner (and the community in general), is backwards compatibility > >> important enough that I should try to take care of it before the > >> deadline? > > > > I think backwards compatibility is important enough that we should > > proba

Re: GSoC 2020: backwards compatibility

2020-08-25 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Werner (and the community in general), is backwards compatibility >> important enough that I should try to take care of it before the >> deadline? > > I think backwards compatibility is important enough that we should > probably have it before merging the code into master. Exactly. However,

Re: GSoC 2020: backwards compatibility

2020-08-25 Thread Carl Sorensen
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 11:19 AM Owen Lamb wrote: > Hi all! > > Daniel drew my attention to the fact that my work doesn't keep backwards > compatibility with other fonts encoded in the LilyPond manner, such as > Gonville. He made a good point--it's definitely worth it to continue > supporting the

GSoC 2020: backwards compatibility

2020-08-25 Thread Owen Lamb
Hi all! Daniel drew my attention to the fact that my work doesn't keep backwards compatibility with other fonts encoded in the LilyPond manner, such as Gonville. He made a good point--it's definitely worth it to continue supporting the old format until Emmentaler reaches a reasonable SMuFL or "ext