Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable 2)

2011-08-22 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:19:23AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > Think we need to change the description of this on the tracker to > make it clear it's not just collisions. ok,done. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable 2)

2011-08-21 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" * Type-ugly: replaces Type-collision, and it will include things like bad slurs in addition to actual collision. Think we need to change the description of this on the tracker to make it clear it's not just collisions. -- Phil

Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable 2)

2011-08-20 Thread Janek Warchoł
LGTM 2011/8/16 Graham Percival : > Minor update for clarity and discussion from the past few days. > We're aiming to accept the final proposal on Thursday. > http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_8.html > > > ** Proposal summary > > Let’s get rid of priorities. We will simply describe bugs in > neut

Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable 2)

2011-08-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:20:02AM +0100, Ian Hulin wrote: > 1. Some nit-picky stuff to make the proposal crystal-clear to > skim-readers like me. > See comments below embedded in the your original message text. Thanks, all fixed. > 2. I'd like to consider two types to use as additional info to t

RE: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable 2)

2011-08-16 Thread Carl Sorensen
-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable 2) Minor update for clarity and discussion from the past few days. We're aiming to accept the final proposal on Thursday. http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_8.html ** Proposal summary Let’s get rid of priorities. We will simply describe bugs in neutral

Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable 2)

2011-08-16 Thread Ian Hulin
Hi Graham, 1. Some nit-picky stuff to make the proposal crystal-clear to skim-readers like me. See comments below embedded in the your original message text. 2. I'd like to consider two types to use as additional info to the current ones: Type-User-development and Type-Developer-development. 2.1

Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable 2)

2011-08-16 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, August 16, 2011 5:51 AM Minor update for clarity and discussion from the past few days. We're aiming to accept the final proposal on Thursday. http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_8.html LGTM Trevor - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.

GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable 2)

2011-08-15 Thread Graham Percival
Minor update for clarity and discussion from the past few days. We're aiming to accept the final proposal on Thursday. http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_8.html ** Proposal summary Let’s get rid of priorities. We will simply describe bugs in neutral terms; each contributor can search and interp