On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:50:56AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > * Reserve the savannah lilypond.git repository for logical
> > branches of master.
>
> I've moved ikebana to
> https://github.com/hanwen/ikebana
>
> I could a
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> I've made a few clarifications to the original proposal, but
> nothing substantial is changed.
>
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html
>
> ** Proposal summary
>
> Our source code hosting is confused: some branches of lilypond
> sava
2011/9/15 Janek Warchoł :
> 2011/9/15 Graham Percival :
>> ** Unchanged branches
>> (...)
>> stable/*
>
> I'm wondering if we can get rid of them, but i'm not sure about one
> thing: are they just a point in our history, i.e.
> ... (lots of commits) ...<2.x stable release commit>
> ... (lots of c
2011/9/15 Graham Percival :
> ** Unchanged branches
> (...)
> stable/*
I'm wondering if we can get rid of them, but i'm not sure about one
thing: are they just a point in our history, i.e.
... (lots of commits) ...<2.x stable release commit>
... (lots of commits) ... ?
Or are they true branches,
LGTM
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 11:33 PM
Subject: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories (probable decision)
I've made a few clarifications to the original proposal, but
nothing substantial is changed.
http
I've made a few clarifications to the original proposal, but
nothing substantial is changed.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html
** Proposal summary
Our source code hosting is confused: some branches of lilypond
savannah are confusing and should removed, while other parts of
our source c
