Graham Percival wrote:
Sounds good to me. Could somebody make this change in master?
Fixed!
/Mats
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Sounds good to me. Could somebody make this change in master?
Cheers,
- Graham
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
In these situations, the actual notes you enter are just placeholders to
be able to specify a rhythm (which is the only thing of interest in this
notation). So, why would you bother to use extr
Mats Bengtsson skrev:
So, why would you bother to use extra key strokes to specify
a note with an accidental?
Of course you wouldn't. But as the notes are represented as notes, they
transpose.
So even though you do not enter an accidental, it might appear after
transposition.
-Rune
_
In these situations, the actual notes you enter are just placeholders to
be able to specify a rhythm (which is the only thing of interest in this
notation). So, why would you bother to use extra key strokes to specify
a note with an accidental?
Having written this, I just realize one obvious such
Eyolf Østrem wrote:
The improvisationOn/Off command produces squashed noteheads -- fine -- but
if there are accidentals in the input code -- as in the example in the docs
(1.1.4 Note heads in the GDP version of the docs) -- these are retained,
Let's give them a minimal example:
\new Voice \w
The improvisationOn/Off command produces squashed noteheads -- fine -- but
if there are accidentals in the input code -- as in the example in the docs
(1.1.4 Note heads in the GDP version of the docs) -- these are retained,
which looks strange and defies the purpose of the squashing: to remove the
