Re: GDP: "Predefined commands" vs. "commonly teaked properties"

2007-09-22 Thread Valentin Villenave
2007/9/22, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 9/21/07, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should we keep @refcommands independent from @commonprop ? For example, > > look at Tuplets. Do you like it as it is, or should we move > > > > \tupletUp \tupletDown etc > > > > inside the "Co

Re: GDP: "Predefined commands" vs. "commonly teaked properties"

2007-09-22 Thread Trevor Bača
On 9/21/07, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should we keep @refcommands independent from @commonprop ? For example, > look at Tuplets. Do you like it as it is, or should we move > > \tupletUp \tupletDown etc > > inside the "Commonly tweaked properties" ? I vote for combine. --

GDP: "Predefined commands" vs. "commonly teaked properties"

2007-09-21 Thread Graham Percival
Should we keep @refcommands independent from @commonprop ? For example, look at Tuplets. Do you like it as it is, or should we move \tupletUp \tupletDown etc inside the "Commonly tweaked properties" ? Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing l