Re: Fwd: MusicXML

2016-02-18 Thread Urs Liska
Am 18.02.2016 um 09:44 schrieb James Lowe: > I hope this isn't off-topic but could we get together with the > Philomelos people? > > https://github.com/Philomelos/lilypond-musicxml2ly-dev > > I am not sure of the motivation to fork, but if it was just because no > one was working on MusicXML and

Re: Fwd: MusicXML

2016-02-18 Thread James Lowe
Hello, On 18/02/16 02:54, Urs Liska wrote: Hi David, nice to read that. I think coming to GSoC with an idea is more important than the listed mentor availability. Continuing on the Scheme/XML track would be very rewarding. However, for some reasons I'd try to go into a more generic direction

Re: Fwd: MusicXML

2016-02-17 Thread Urs Liska
Hi David, nice to read that. I think coming to GSoC with an idea is more important than the listed mentor availability. Continuing on the Scheme/XML track would be very rewarding. However, for some reasons I'd try to go into a more generic direction. This could be very suitable for integratio

Fwd: MusicXML

2016-02-17 Thread David Garfinkle
Hi there! Hope everyone had a lovely new year. School has kept me busy, but I'm still interested in continuing work on the MusicXML project that I started over the summer. I just caught up in mailing-list readings for the topic, so I think I'm correct in assuming that it hasn't been added to the c