Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:28 AM
Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 schrieb Graham Percival:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:32:08 +0200
> > Shouldn't that really be \octave #x since other commands are in
> > English?
>
> Probably yes, but lilypond had already an \octave function, which
2008/7/27 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> \ottava produces *ottava brackets* in the output, so this perfectly
> makes sense, and \ottava is shorter to type, isn't it Valentin ;-) ?
I also favour \ottava.
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:11:14 -0300
"Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Valentin Villenave
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2008/7/27 Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> What do you think? I'd vote for \octavation, which is also closer
> >>
On 2008/07/24 13:49 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > Hello Han-Wen,
> > Do you have any opinion about this patch (adds \ottava #x, which is
> > supposed
> > to make #(set-octavation x) obsolete)? Okay to apply to master?
>
> Shouldn't that really be \octave #x since other c
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Valentin Villenave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/27 Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> What do you think? I'd vote for \octavation, which is also closer to the
>> deprecated #(set-octavation ...).
>
> I'd say that \octavation is a bit long to type (t
2008/7/27 Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What do you think? I'd vote for \octavation, which is also closer to the
> deprecated #(set-octavation ...).
I'd say that \octavation is a bit long to type (though much shorter
than #(set-octavation)). I'd vote for a very very short command such
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 schrieb Graham Percival:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:32:08 +0200
> > > Shouldn't that really be \octave #x since other commands are in
> > > English?
> >
> > Probably yes, but lilypond had already an \octave function, which
>
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Hello Han-Wen,
> Do you have any opinion about this patch (adds \ottava #x, which is
> supposed
> to make #(set-octavation x) obsolete)? Okay to apply to master?
Shouldn't that really be \octave #x since other commands are in English?
Paul Scott
>
> Cheers,
> Reinhold
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:32:08 +0200
Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 schrieb Paul Scott:
> > Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > > Hello Han-Wen,
> > > Do you have any opinion about this patch (adds \ottava #
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 schrieb Paul Scott:
> Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > Hello Han-Wen,
> > Do you have any opinion about this patch (adds \ottava #x, which is
> > supposed
> > to make #(set-octavation x) obsolete)? Okay to apply to master?
>
>
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Hello Han-Wen,
> Do you have any opinion about this patch (adds \ottava #x, which is
> supposed
> to make #(set-octavation x) obsolete)? Okay to apply to master?
Shouldn't that really be \octave #x since other commands are in English?
Paul Scott
>
> Cheers,
> Reinhold
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Han-Wen,
Do you have any opinion about this patch (adds \ottava #x, which is supposed
to make #(set-octavation x) obsolete)? Okay to apply to master?
Cheers,
Reinhold
- -- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Subject: [PATCH] Re: Oct
12 matches
Mail list logo
