Re: Fix STEPMAKE_GET_VERSION for OpenBSD

2009-12-16 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op woensdag 16-12-2009 om 11:40 uur [tijdzone +1100], schreef pet...@gelato.unsw.edu.au: > > "Matthias" == Matthias Kilian writes: > This is very complicated. Why not just something like: It /is/ very complicated. > { lilypond -V || lilypond --version; } 2>&1 | > sed -n -e 's/^[^0-

Re: Fix STEPMAKE_GET_VERSION for OpenBSD

2009-12-15 Thread peterc
> "Matthias" == Matthias Kilian writes: Matthias> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:33:14PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen Matthias> wrote: >> > (I really > don't remember the reason, too much time has passed >> since I made > this patch) >> >> It would be nice to know why we need this, esp. as this fix

Re: Fix STEPMAKE_GET_VERSION for OpenBSD

2009-12-15 Thread Patrick McCarty
On 2009-12-15, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op dinsdag 15-12-2009 om 20:01 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Matthias > Kilian: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:33:14PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > > > It would be nice to know why we need this, esp. as this fix > > > does not make the logic more re

Re: Fix STEPMAKE_GET_VERSION for OpenBSD

2009-12-15 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op dinsdag 15-12-2009 om 20:01 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Matthias Kilian: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:33:14PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > It would be nice to know why we need this, esp. as this fix > > does not make the logic more readible. > > Not necessary, I aready had a closer lo

Re: Fix STEPMAKE_GET_VERSION for OpenBSD

2009-12-15 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:33:14PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > (I really > > don't remember the reason, too much time has passed since I made > > this patch) > > It would be nice to know why we need this, esp. as this fix > does not make the logic more readible. Not necessary, I aready ha

Re: Fix STEPMAKE_GET_VERSION for OpenBSD

2009-12-15 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op dinsdag 15-12-2009 om 14:05 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Graham > Percival: >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:00:34PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: >> > On 2009-12-13, Matthias Kilian wrote: > >> I'm also hesitant, but don't have time to

Re: Fix STEPMAKE_GET_VERSION for OpenBSD

2009-12-15 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op dinsdag 15-12-2009 om 14:05 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Graham Percival: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:00:34PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > On 2009-12-13, Matthias Kilian wrote: > I'm also hesitant, but don't have time to test it at the moment. > If nobody more knowledgeable says "it's ok

Re: Fix STEPMAKE_GET_VERSION for OpenBSD

2009-12-15 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op zondag 13-12-2009 om 20:14 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Matthias Kilian: > (I really > don't remember the reason, too much time has passed since I made > this patch) It would be nice to know why we need this, esp. as this fix does not make the logic more readible. By cutting the command in b

Re: Fix STEPMAKE_GET_VERSION for OpenBSD

2009-12-15 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:00:34PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On 2009-12-13, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > > > I have this as a patch in the lilypond port of OpenBSD for years > > (since 2006, IIRC), and it looks like I still need it for the > > development branch. Without this, configure isn't

Re: Fix STEPMAKE_GET_VERSION for OpenBSD

2009-12-14 Thread Patrick McCarty
On 2009-12-13, Matthias Kilian wrote: > Hi, > > I have this as a patch in the lilypond port of OpenBSD for years > (since 2006, IIRC), and it looks like I still need it for the > development branch. Without this, configure isn't able to detect > the versions of at least texi2html, makeinfo and bis

Fix STEPMAKE_GET_VERSION for OpenBSD

2009-12-13 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, I have this as a patch in the lilypond port of OpenBSD for years (since 2006, IIRC), and it looks like I still need it for the development branch. Without this, configure isn't able to detect the versions of at least texi2html, makeinfo and bison. (I really don't remember the reason, too much