Re: Fix 1456 (issue3693042)

2010-12-20 Thread percival . music . ca
LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/3693042/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Fix 1456 (issue3693042)

2010-12-19 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
Thanks for the review, Patrick. I've made the changes and posted a new patch set. http://codereview.appspot.com/3693042/diff/9001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/3693042/diff/9001/Documentation/notation/rhyth

Re: Fix 1456 (issue3693042)

2010-12-19 Thread pkx166h
Just some Nitpicks http://codereview.appspot.com/3693042/diff/9001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/3693042/diff/9001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely::

Re: Fix 1456 (issue3693042)

2010-12-19 Thread n . puttock
LGTM. http://codereview.appspot.com/3693042/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Fix 1456 (issue3693042)

2010-12-17 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
Thanks for the excellent feedback. I've fixed everything now. A revised patch set is available. http://codereview.appspot.com/3693042/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (left): http://codereview.appspot.com/3693042/diff/1/Documentation/nota

Re: Fix 1456 (issue3693042)

2010-12-17 Thread n . puttock
http://codereview.appspot.com/3693042/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (left): http://codereview.appspot.com/3693042/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#oldcode1059 Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1059: \relative c' { \new Staff

Re: Fix 1456 (issue3693042)

2010-12-17 Thread Mike Solomon
From: > To: > Cc: ; > Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 1:53 PM > Subject: Re: Fix 1456 (issue3693042) > > >> Looks fine from a quick eyeball, but I haven't tested it. >> >> >> We've had a few people bragging about their computers lately, so

Re: Fix 1456 (issue3693042)

2010-12-17 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: To: Cc: ; Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 1:53 PM Subject: Re: Fix 1456 (issue3693042) Looks fine from a quick eyeball, but I haven't tested it. We've had a few people bragging about their computers lately, so could one of them try applying

Re: Fix 1456 (issue3693042)

2010-12-17 Thread percival . music . ca
Looks fine from a quick eyeball, but I haven't tested it. We've had a few people bragging about their computers lately, so could one of them try applying this patch and make sure that everything compiles from scratch? Using the lilybuntu instructions, "from scratch" means removing the build/ di

Re: Fix 1456 (issue3693042)

2010-12-17 Thread percival . music . ca
oops, I hit "reply to comment" intead of "publish+send". Here's my only comment on the patch. http://codereview.appspot.com/3693042/diff/1/input/regression/skiptypesetting-multimeasurerest.ly File input/regression/skiptypesetting-multimeasurerest.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/36930

Fix 1456 (issue3693042)

2010-12-16 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
Reviewers: , Message: Here's a fix for issue 1456. I've taken the context argument out of \overrideTimeSignatureSettings and \revertTimeSignatureSettings. They now apply to the Timing context. I've also added an example showing how to have different time signature settings in different staves.