Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-15 Thread julien . rioux
On 2012/02/15 11:50:56, mail_philholmes.net wrote: - Original Message - From: > Looks good, I just have a few suggestions to avoid clashing log file > names and I wonder how this part of GOP 9 might be implemented down the > road: > "All other logfiles wi

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-15 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: To: ; ; ; Cc: ; Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 1:56 PM Subject: Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064) Looks good, I just have a few suggestions to avoid clashing log file names and I wonder how this part of GOP 9 might be implemented down

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-14 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" > To: "Graham Percival" > Cc: ; ; > ; ; > > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 11:47 AM > Subject: Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064) > > &

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-14 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Graham Percival" Cc: ; ; ; ; Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 11:47 AM Subject: Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064) Graham Percival writes: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:05:56AM +, d...@gnu.

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-13 Thread Jean-Charles Malahieude
Le 13/02/2012 14:56, julien.ri...@gmail.com disait : Looks good, I just have a few suggestions to avoid clashing log file names and I wonder how this part of GOP 9 might be implemented down the road: "All other logfiles will go in the @file{build/logfiles/} directory." http://codereview.appspot

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-13 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:47:22PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > > > My rule of thumb is that if I don't understand something easily, > > then at least 50% of future lilypond contributors won't understand > > it either. > > eval is ugly and a little-travelled corner, an

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-13 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:05:56AM +, d...@gnu.org wrote: >> >> scripts/build/run-and-check.sh:2: eval $1 > $2 2>&1 >> >> Actually, it is totally basic shell scripting here. > > Well, apparently you don't need "basic" shell scripting for 7 > years of full-time linu

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-13 Thread julien . rioux
Looks good, I just have a few suggestions to avoid clashing log file names and I wonder how this part of GOP 9 might be implemented down the road: "All other logfiles will go in the @file{build/logfiles/} directory." http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/diff/5003/Documentation/GNUmakefile File

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-13 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:05:56AM +, d...@gnu.org wrote: > > scripts/build/run-and-check.sh:2: eval $1 > $2 2>&1 > > Actually, it is totally basic shell scripting here. Well, apparently you don't need "basic" shell scripting for 7 years of full-time linux use and 4 years of macosx use, and

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-13 Thread PhilEHolmes
Comments added describing eval line. http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-13 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: To: ; ; ; Cc: ; Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 10:53 AM Subject: Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064) LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/diff/4001/scripts/build/run-and-check.sh File scripts/build/run-and-check.sh (right

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-13 Thread dak
http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/diff/4001/scripts/build/run-and-check.sh File scripts/build/run-and-check.sh (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/diff/4001/scripts/build/run-and-check.sh#newcode2 scripts/build/run-and-check.sh:2: eval $1 > $2 2>&1 On 2012/02/13 10:53:44, Graham P

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-13 Thread graham
LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/diff/4001/scripts/build/run-and-check.sh File scripts/build/run-and-check.sh (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/diff/4001/scripts/build/run-and-check.sh#newcode2 scripts/build/run-and-check.sh:2: eval $1 > $2 2>&1 I know this has already be

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-11 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: Cc: ; ; Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 5:20 PM Subject: Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064) philehol...@googlemail.com writes: Reviewers: dak, Graham Percival, Julien Rioux, Message: Latest GOP

Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-11 Thread David Kastrup
philehol...@googlemail.com writes: > Reviewers: dak, Graham Percival, Julien Rioux, > > Message: > Latest GOP 9 make doc reduction - please review. > > Description: > I've opened a new issue to avoid confusion. AFAICS this redirects all > the output from texi2pdf, makeinfo and tex2html to logfile

Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)

2012-02-11 Thread PhilEHolmes
Reviewers: dak, Graham Percival, Julien Rioux, Message: Latest GOP 9 make doc reduction - please review. Description: I've opened a new issue to avoid confusion. AFAICS this redirects all the output from texi2pdf, makeinfo and tex2html to logfiles. I've used Julien and David's suggestion of ge