Re: Feature request: more repeat signs

2008-11-18 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
2008/11/18 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It's fixed in git; I forgot to make sure that the volta bracket checks > for the new barline strings when deciding to hide the right edge. Nice! Thanks. I'll try it again when the next version is released. >> That warning also occurs with the defaul

Re: Feature request: more repeat signs

2008-11-18 Thread Neil Puttock
Hi Risto, 2008/11/18 Risto Vääräniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I just noticed in the NEWS that this feature has been added too > Lilypond. I had to test it immediately. :-) There seems to be a small > problem with manual volta brackets (don't ask me why I used them, > sometimes a man's got to do wh

Re: Feature request: more repeat signs

2008-11-18 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
Hi Neil, 2008/9/4 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/9/3 Risto Vääräniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Thanks Neil. They look very nice. Do they work with the volta brackets? > > Yes. You'd just have to override the default setting for > doubleRepeatType to use the new styles automatically. I

Re: Feature request: more repeat signs

2008-09-10 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
2008/9/9 Neil Puttock: > It works OK as long as there's a break (Mats fixed it in January). > > To ensure that the custom barline reverts back to a standard type if > there's no break would require some kludgy work in > repeat-acknowledge-engraver.cc I think. Ah, I had misinterpreted Mats' messag

Re: Feature request: more repeat signs

2008-09-09 Thread Neil Puttock
2008/9/8 Risto Vääräniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/9/4 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Yes. You'd just have to override the default setting for >> doubleRepeatType to use the new styles automatically. > > Sorry to pester you again with this nice new feature... > > Im' sure the automatic v

Re: Feature request: more repeat signs

2008-09-08 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
2008/9/4 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yes. You'd just have to override the default setting for > doubleRepeatType to use the new styles automatically. Sorry to pester you again with this nice new feature... Im' sure the automatic volta brackets will work fine. Have you also tested it with

Re: Feature request: more repeat signs

2008-09-03 Thread Neil Puttock
2008/9/3 Risto Vääräniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thanks Neil. They look very nice. Do they work with the volta brackets? Yes. You'd just have to override the default setting for doubleRepeatType to use the new styles automatically. Regards, Neil ___ li

Re: Feature request: more repeat signs

2008-09-03 Thread Neil Puttock
2008/9/3 Risto Vääräniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thanks Neil. They look very nice. Do they work with the volta brackets? Yes. You'd just have to override the default setting for doubleRepeatType to use the new styles automatically. Regards, Neil ___ li

Re: Feature request: more repeat signs

2008-09-02 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
2008/9/3 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I've knocked up a patch which implements these styles, together with a > context property `doubleRepeatType' for setting the default style > using \repeat volta. At a line break, both styles will revert to ":|" > (before) and "|:" (after). > > If the p

Re: Feature request: more repeat signs

2008-09-02 Thread Neil Puttock
Hi Mark, 2008/9/2 Mark Polesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Developers - thank you for such an awesome program! > > Feature request: more repeat signs > > Two "double-sided" repeat-sign styles (commonly found in print) > are missing from LilyPond, as far as I can te

Feature request: more repeat signs

2008-09-02 Thread Mark Polesky
Developers - thank you for such an awesome program! Feature request: more repeat signs Two "double-sided" repeat-sign styles (commonly found in print) are missing from LilyPond, as far as I can tell: 1.) repeat dots, thin line, thick line, thin line, repeat dots 2.) repeat dots,