On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:48:26 +0100
"Anthony Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just checked - the 2.9.9 manual (I was using 2.9.7) and it's
> still wrong.
>
> Looking at the pdf ... section 9, p195 (page 205 as per acrobat).
> Second para, http ref on the penultimate line, says 2.8 and t
ungman
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Documentation - Section 9 Changing Defaults
Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
>
>> It's great that you're sending feedback about the docs, but please
>> check the most recent version before sending problem reports!
>> - Graham
>
Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
It's great that you're sending feedback about the docs, but please
check the most recent version before sending problem reports!
- Graham
I'll download the update, and start going through that soon :-)
If you have a slow connection, why not simply check the
parti
-
From: Graham Percival [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2006 23:38
To: Anthony Youngman
Cc: lily-devel
Subject: Re: Documentation - Section 9 Changing Defaults
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:10:07 +0100
"Anthony Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 2.9 manual I'm lo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Graham Percival
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:10:07 +0100
"Anthony Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The 2.9 manual I'm looking at (it might have changed in the latest
version) is still pointing at the 2.8 Program Reference.
The 2.9 manua
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:10:07 +0100
"Anthony Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 2.9 manual I'm looking at (it might have changed in the latest
> version) is still pointing at the 2.8 Program Reference.
The 2.9 manual on the web points at the 2.9 program reference. I
assume you're talking
The 2.9 manual I'm looking at (it might have changed in the latest
version) is still pointing at the 2.8 Program Reference.
Cheers,
Wol
* *
This transmission is intended for the named recipient only. It may contain
private
